Re: Bridgeport way wear
Posted by
knives01us
on 2005-02-11 01:17:28 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Jon Elson <elson@p...> wrote:
I scraped a 10" South Bend with 5 foot bed a few years ago, with 3 V
ways & 1 flat. Not a hardened bed but interesting due to .020" wear
at the worst spot.
I never did a Bridgeport, but I think the table would be a particular
challenge due to length. It seems as though it would require long
straightedges and a helper to do the spotting.
I think the commonly given advice to "get a Bridgeport" is not always
the best choice. But then most of the Bridgeports I see used are at
Boeing Surplus and they're very, very tired.
In my case, the parts I make for my business
fall within a 1 1/2" x 5" envelope, so the logical decision for me
was a
very stiff, heavy mill with 10" x 8" table travels. The wear of
production work is more proportional to table travel and I could
scrape a 20" long table if I have to.
> >long, a
> Having "scraped-in" a hardened Sheldon lathe bed that's SIX FEET
> cast ironbed
> Bridgeport ought to be a piece of cake by comparison. The Sheldon
> is supposedthe
> to be flame sprayed, but it seemed to be as hard as tool steel all
> way through to me!but
> I managed to get it straight to about .0005" over the full 6 feet,
> it was a bear to do withchecking
> Cratex abrasives in a die grinder, lapping with bench stones,
> with straightedgescost
> and spotting dye, and a Talyvel electronic level.
>
> So, now that I already have the tools and techniques, it wouldn't
> me cash, just time.I'd
> I could pull the table off and fix that up pretty quickly, but then
> have the table betterways
> than the rest of the machine. There's a loose spot in the knee
> that needs attention,:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
> too.
>
> Jon
I scraped a 10" South Bend with 5 foot bed a few years ago, with 3 V
ways & 1 flat. Not a hardened bed but interesting due to .020" wear
at the worst spot.
I never did a Bridgeport, but I think the table would be a particular
challenge due to length. It seems as though it would require long
straightedges and a helper to do the spotting.
I think the commonly given advice to "get a Bridgeport" is not always
the best choice. But then most of the Bridgeports I see used are at
Boeing Surplus and they're very, very tired.
In my case, the parts I make for my business
fall within a 1 1/2" x 5" envelope, so the logical decision for me
was a
very stiff, heavy mill with 10" x 8" table travels. The wear of
production work is more proportional to table travel and I could
scrape a 20" long table if I have to.
Discussion Thread
Polaraligned
2005-02-10 04:34:38 UTC
Bridgeport way wear
R Rogers
2005-02-10 06:27:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport way wear,lubrication fix
Thomas Powell
2005-02-10 09:16:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport way wear,lubrication fix
R Rogers
2005-02-10 10:01:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport way wear,lubrication fix
Randy Wink
2005-02-10 10:13:34 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport way wear,lubrication fix
Jon Elson
2005-02-10 10:30:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport way wear
Jon Elson
2005-02-10 10:41:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport way wear,lubrication fix
David A. Frantz
2005-02-10 10:43:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport way wear,lubrication fix
Jon Elson
2005-02-10 10:46:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport way wear,lubrication fix
David A. Frantz
2005-02-10 10:56:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport way wear,lubrication fix
Thomas Powell
2005-02-10 11:03:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport way wear,lubrication fix
Thomas Powell
2005-02-10 11:06:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport way wear,lubrication fix
Bruce Pigeon
2005-02-10 11:30:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport way wear,lubrication fix
Les Newell
2005-02-10 12:07:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport way wear,lubrication fix
R Rogers
2005-02-10 12:09:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport way wear,lubrication fix
Polaraligned
2005-02-10 12:15:56 UTC
Re: Bridgeport way wear
R Rogers
2005-02-10 12:22:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport way wear,lubrication fix
David A. Frantz
2005-02-10 13:40:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport way wear,lubrication fix
Thomas Powell
2005-02-10 16:22:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport way wear,lubrication fix
R Rogers
2005-02-10 17:03:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport way wear,lubrication fix
Scott L Golden
2005-02-10 18:46:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport way wear,lubrication fix
Jon Elson
2005-02-10 19:57:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport way wear,lubrication fix
Jon Elson
2005-02-10 20:00:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport way wear,lubrication fix
Jon Elson
2005-02-10 20:07:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport way wear
Eric Keller
2005-02-10 20:34:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport way wear
knives01us
2005-02-11 01:17:28 UTC
Re: Bridgeport way wear
Polaraligned
2005-02-11 03:44:37 UTC
Re: Bridgeport way wear
Jon Elson
2005-02-11 10:25:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport way wear
Jon Elson
2005-02-11 10:34:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport way wear
David A. Frantz
2005-02-11 11:22:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport way wear,lubrication fix
R Rogers
2005-02-11 16:21:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport way wear,lubrication fix
Stephen Wille Padnos
2005-02-11 18:14:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport way wear,lubrication fix