Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Digest Number 4217
    Posted by
    
      Ron Ginger
    
  
  
    on 2005-03-23 06:41:18 UTC
  
  Lapping, by putting a compound between the sliding parts and moving them 
back and forth is nothing less that accelerating the wear on the
machine. You improve nothing, you just wear it out, exactly as is going
to happen over its life.
Lapping (or scraping) the parts with respect to some master surface
known to be flat and true could make an improvement.
Why do people continue to refer to using lapping compound to accelerate
the wear as lapping?
ron ginger
back and forth is nothing less that accelerating the wear on the
machine. You improve nothing, you just wear it out, exactly as is going
to happen over its life.
Lapping (or scraping) the parts with respect to some master surface
known to be flat and true could make an improvement.
Why do people continue to refer to using lapping compound to accelerate
the wear as lapping?
ron ginger
Discussion Thread
  
    Ron Ginger
  
2005-03-23 06:41:18 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Digest Number 4217
  
    turbulatordude
  
2005-03-23 07:23:03 UTC
  Re: Digest Number 4217
  
    turbulatordude
  
2005-03-23 07:53:36 UTC
  Re: Digest Number 4217
  
    R Rogers
  
2005-03-23 08:29:59 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Digest Number 4217
  
    R Rogers
  
2005-03-23 08:53:50 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Digest Number 4217
  
    Dave Shiels
  
2005-03-23 08:56:52 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Digest Number 4217
  
    Dave Shiels
  
2005-03-23 22:23:04 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Digest Number 4217
  
    turbulatordude
  
2005-03-23 22:31:26 UTC
  Re: Digest Number 4217
  
    Bill Vance
  
2005-03-24 03:33:22 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Digest Number 4217
  
    Dan Mauch
  
2005-03-24 06:11:13 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Digest Number 4217