Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Digest Number 4217
Posted by
Ron Ginger
on 2005-03-23 06:41:18 UTC
Lapping, by putting a compound between the sliding parts and moving them
back and forth is nothing less that accelerating the wear on the
machine. You improve nothing, you just wear it out, exactly as is going
to happen over its life.
Lapping (or scraping) the parts with respect to some master surface
known to be flat and true could make an improvement.
Why do people continue to refer to using lapping compound to accelerate
the wear as lapping?
ron ginger
back and forth is nothing less that accelerating the wear on the
machine. You improve nothing, you just wear it out, exactly as is going
to happen over its life.
Lapping (or scraping) the parts with respect to some master surface
known to be flat and true could make an improvement.
Why do people continue to refer to using lapping compound to accelerate
the wear as lapping?
ron ginger
Discussion Thread
Ron Ginger
2005-03-23 06:41:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Digest Number 4217
turbulatordude
2005-03-23 07:23:03 UTC
Re: Digest Number 4217
turbulatordude
2005-03-23 07:53:36 UTC
Re: Digest Number 4217
R Rogers
2005-03-23 08:29:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Digest Number 4217
R Rogers
2005-03-23 08:53:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Digest Number 4217
Dave Shiels
2005-03-23 08:56:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Digest Number 4217
Dave Shiels
2005-03-23 22:23:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Digest Number 4217
turbulatordude
2005-03-23 22:31:26 UTC
Re: Digest Number 4217
Bill Vance
2005-03-24 03:33:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Digest Number 4217
Dan Mauch
2005-03-24 06:11:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Digest Number 4217