Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Digest Number 4217
Posted by
Dave Shiels
on 2005-03-23 08:56:52 UTC
R Rogers wrote:
>// I totally agree. This notion that a guy out in his garage wobbling the table back and forth through the saddle with lapping compound is somehow going to improve the machine is just wishful thinking. The surfaces may be rough but theoretically they are accurate. As the high spots go away, so goes the precision. They are short life machines. "Lapping" in this manner makes it even shorter. The best remedy for this is dont buy them. It goes back to the manufacturing, they just to need to slow the machines down on the finish pass. ///
>Ron Ginger <ronginger@...> wrote:
>
>Lapping, by putting a compound between the sliding parts and moving them
>back and forth is nothing less that accelerating the wear on the
>machine. You improve nothing, you just wear it out, exactly as is going
>to happen over its life.
>
>
Discussion Thread
Ron Ginger
2005-03-23 06:41:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Digest Number 4217
turbulatordude
2005-03-23 07:23:03 UTC
Re: Digest Number 4217
turbulatordude
2005-03-23 07:53:36 UTC
Re: Digest Number 4217
R Rogers
2005-03-23 08:29:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Digest Number 4217
R Rogers
2005-03-23 08:53:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Digest Number 4217
Dave Shiels
2005-03-23 08:56:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Digest Number 4217
Dave Shiels
2005-03-23 22:23:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Digest Number 4217
turbulatordude
2005-03-23 22:31:26 UTC
Re: Digest Number 4217
Bill Vance
2005-03-24 03:33:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Digest Number 4217
Dan Mauch
2005-03-24 06:11:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Digest Number 4217