Re: Digest Number 4217
    Posted by
    
      turbulatordude
    
  
  
    on 2005-03-23 07:53:36 UTC
  
  --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Ron Ginger <ronginger@a...> 
wrote:
Most of us who have done any lapping to get parts to fit use both
parts.
Also, it is my understanding, and I may be wrong, that lapping is the
term of the process and does not define what parts are used, but just
that some grit or compound is used between surfaces.
I use the term because some years ago when first introduced to the
concept and proceedure, that was what was used. If you have a better
term, I would be very happy to use that instead. Machinery's
handbook did not offer a defination, only a proceedure.
Dave
ps: People who call a ball bearing center in a tailstock a live
center is my favorite incorrect use of words.
wrote:
> Lapping, by putting a compound between the sliding parts and movingthem
> back and forth is nothing less that accelerating the wear on thegoing
> machine. You improve nothing, you just wear it out, exactly as is
> to happen over its life.accelerate
>
> Lapping (or scraping) the parts with respect to some master surface
> known to be flat and true could make an improvement.
>
> Why do people continue to refer to using lapping compound to
> the wear as lapping?Op's sorry, didn't totally understand your question.
>
> ron ginger
Most of us who have done any lapping to get parts to fit use both
parts.
Also, it is my understanding, and I may be wrong, that lapping is the
term of the process and does not define what parts are used, but just
that some grit or compound is used between surfaces.
I use the term because some years ago when first introduced to the
concept and proceedure, that was what was used. If you have a better
term, I would be very happy to use that instead. Machinery's
handbook did not offer a defination, only a proceedure.
Dave
ps: People who call a ball bearing center in a tailstock a live
center is my favorite incorrect use of words.
Discussion Thread
  
    Ron Ginger
  
2005-03-23 06:41:18 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Digest Number 4217
  
    turbulatordude
  
2005-03-23 07:23:03 UTC
  Re: Digest Number 4217
  
    turbulatordude
  
2005-03-23 07:53:36 UTC
  Re: Digest Number 4217
  
    R Rogers
  
2005-03-23 08:29:59 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Digest Number 4217
  
    R Rogers
  
2005-03-23 08:53:50 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Digest Number 4217
  
    Dave Shiels
  
2005-03-23 08:56:52 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Digest Number 4217
  
    Dave Shiels
  
2005-03-23 22:23:04 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Digest Number 4217
  
    turbulatordude
  
2005-03-23 22:31:26 UTC
  Re: Digest Number 4217
  
    Bill Vance
  
2005-03-24 03:33:22 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Digest Number 4217
  
    Dan Mauch
  
2005-03-24 06:11:13 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Digest Number 4217