where's the torque ?
Posted by
turbulatordude
on 2005-05-16 09:09:48 UTC
I've been running thru the torque numbers for motors and seem to be
missing something.
A 1-1/2hp treadmill motor with 5,100 RPM has 296 oz-in torque.
On a rack and pinion. and using a 1.25" pitch, we can round the
distance per gear rotation to 4 inches. 1.25*pi=3.926, so 4 is close
enough.
When we calculate for a leadscrew, we come back to inches of table
movement. do we also do that for routers ?
I mean that we put on a 600oz-in motor, then multiply that by 5TPI to
get 3,000 OZ-IN that would mean 3,000 per inch, no ?
That would make the motor 296/4=74 oz-in if it were direct drive.
using 6:1 pulleys would then multiply that up to 444 oz-in. or 444 per
inch ?
The leadscrew moves 1 inch per 5 motor rev or 0.2" per rev while the
rack moves 1.5 revs per in. Gearing up to get 5 rev's per inch would
mean a 20:1 pulley to the 1:4 rack gear. If course that would
multiply the 296 by 5 for 1,482oz-in.
Since I've seen routers and plasma cutter run with much smaller motors
and much smaller ratios (3:1 on a 350 oz-in stepper) it seems I'm
missing something.
Anyone see my mistakes or what I've overlooked ?
Dave
missing something.
A 1-1/2hp treadmill motor with 5,100 RPM has 296 oz-in torque.
On a rack and pinion. and using a 1.25" pitch, we can round the
distance per gear rotation to 4 inches. 1.25*pi=3.926, so 4 is close
enough.
When we calculate for a leadscrew, we come back to inches of table
movement. do we also do that for routers ?
I mean that we put on a 600oz-in motor, then multiply that by 5TPI to
get 3,000 OZ-IN that would mean 3,000 per inch, no ?
That would make the motor 296/4=74 oz-in if it were direct drive.
using 6:1 pulleys would then multiply that up to 444 oz-in. or 444 per
inch ?
The leadscrew moves 1 inch per 5 motor rev or 0.2" per rev while the
rack moves 1.5 revs per in. Gearing up to get 5 rev's per inch would
mean a 20:1 pulley to the 1:4 rack gear. If course that would
multiply the 296 by 5 for 1,482oz-in.
Since I've seen routers and plasma cutter run with much smaller motors
and much smaller ratios (3:1 on a 350 oz-in stepper) it seems I'm
missing something.
Anyone see my mistakes or what I've overlooked ?
Dave
Discussion Thread
turbulatordude
2005-05-16 09:09:48 UTC
where's the torque ?
Andy Wander
2005-05-16 09:46:50 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] where's the torque ?
R Rogers
2005-05-16 10:06:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] where's the torque ?
Leslie Watts
2005-05-16 11:16:11 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] where's the torque ?
caudlet
2005-05-16 14:04:35 UTC
Re: where's the torque ?
turbulatordude
2005-05-16 14:23:59 UTC
Re: where's the torque ?
Erie Patsellis
2005-05-16 16:34:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] where's the torque ?
Jon Elson
2005-05-16 18:20:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] where's the torque ?
Leslie Watts
2005-05-17 10:22:55 UTC
[CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] treadmil motor speed reduction analysis
turbulatordude
2005-05-17 13:31:33 UTC
Re: treadmil motor speed reduction analysis
cnc_4_me
2005-05-17 15:34:00 UTC
Re: treadmil motor speed reduction analysis
R Rogers
2005-05-17 16:44:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] treadmil motor speed reduction analysis
Erie Patsellis
2005-05-17 17:06:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] treadmil motor speed reduction analysis
Leslie Watts
2005-05-17 17:15:44 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] treadmil motor speed reduction analysis
volitan712003
2005-05-17 17:31:30 UTC
Re: treadmil motor speed reduction analysis
Leslie Watts
2005-05-17 17:50:53 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: treadmil motor speed reduction analysis
R Rogers
2005-05-17 20:24:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] treadmil motor speed reduction analysis
Erie Patsellis
2005-05-17 20:47:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] treadmil motor speed reduction analysis