Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Z axis drive
Posted by
R Rogers
on 2006-01-06 11:57:05 UTC
spc_aux <aux34@...> wrote: --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, R Rogers
wrote:
mounts and vise). Getting 60 ipm Z rapids on both and use no assist
whatsoever. 40 lb-in DC brush servo 2.5:1 reduction on a G320 Gecko.
I ran one job recently on one of these that consisted of 1280 .875"
reamed holes 3 inches deep in 1018 steel. Alot of pecking. The servo
would have to rest every 4 hours to cool a bit. The Gecko would've
run continually it seems. Great job Mariss..
question. I was wrong.
travel isn't too far, you might benefit by sticking a good sized
(bore) pneumatic cylinder under there connected to a small tank and
regulator. Take some of the load off the leadscrew and you should get
better performance and less heating for very little cost.
Pete C.
/.////////////
Pete,
Both of these get used alot. Under the knee is a very dirty and abrasive environment. Doesnt seem a pneumatic cylinder would last long. As far as the travel that is another issue, these have almost 14" of programmable Z. Not much room for a cylinder of that stroke. These are the knee type with just a hole for the stanchion. Not an open casting. Another consideration when counterbalancing is the alignment of the force relative to the Z axis. The leadscrew or jackscrew is in perfect alignment, dead center of the ways. Mounting an apparatus off to one side of center may impede accuracy and may definitely increase friction, i.e. sideload on ways, binding motion. May be easier on the axis motor but may be damaging the machine over long periods.
I've looked at several of these methods of counterbalancing the knee and none of them seem very practical. Cables, gas struts, springs, cylinders, counterweights, etc. Also, have to remember, storing that much energy as in springs, is very dangerous. Actually the weight of the Z removes all backlash on the leadscrew. The closer it comes to zero balance, the closer it is to an axis with a ton of backlash.
Alot of things to consider.
I've opted to just use large servos and forget counterbalancing. 60 ipm on Z is ample. No cylinders or airlines or tanks to maintain. No springs to fly across the shop. I've set three different knee-mills up this way and no counter-balancing was used.
Ron
Addresses:
FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@..., timg@...
Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... davemucha@... [Moderators]
URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto: aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if you have trouble.
http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
bill
List Mom
List Owner
Yahoo! Groups Links
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
wrote:
>excess of 1000 pounds (knee, table, saddle, ballscrews, 2 servos, 2
> Both of my Bridgeports drive the knee for Z axis and they are in
mounts and vise). Getting 60 ipm Z rapids on both and use no assist
whatsoever. 40 lb-in DC brush servo 2.5:1 reduction on a G320 Gecko.
I ran one job recently on one of these that consisted of 1280 .875"
reamed holes 3 inches deep in 1018 steel. Alot of pecking. The servo
would have to rest every 4 hours to cool a bit. The Gecko would've
run continually it seems. Great job Mariss..
>determined that drilling for prolonged periods would be out of the
> During the retrofit and setting up the electronics, I had
question. I was wrong.
>Since there is plenty of room under the knee on a Bridgeport and the
> Ron
travel isn't too far, you might benefit by sticking a good sized
(bore) pneumatic cylinder under there connected to a small tank and
regulator. Take some of the load off the leadscrew and you should get
better performance and less heating for very little cost.
Pete C.
/.////////////
Pete,
Both of these get used alot. Under the knee is a very dirty and abrasive environment. Doesnt seem a pneumatic cylinder would last long. As far as the travel that is another issue, these have almost 14" of programmable Z. Not much room for a cylinder of that stroke. These are the knee type with just a hole for the stanchion. Not an open casting. Another consideration when counterbalancing is the alignment of the force relative to the Z axis. The leadscrew or jackscrew is in perfect alignment, dead center of the ways. Mounting an apparatus off to one side of center may impede accuracy and may definitely increase friction, i.e. sideload on ways, binding motion. May be easier on the axis motor but may be damaging the machine over long periods.
I've looked at several of these methods of counterbalancing the knee and none of them seem very practical. Cables, gas struts, springs, cylinders, counterweights, etc. Also, have to remember, storing that much energy as in springs, is very dangerous. Actually the weight of the Z removes all backlash on the leadscrew. The closer it comes to zero balance, the closer it is to an axis with a ton of backlash.
Alot of things to consider.
I've opted to just use large servos and forget counterbalancing. 60 ipm on Z is ample. No cylinders or airlines or tanks to maintain. No springs to fly across the shop. I've set three different knee-mills up this way and no counter-balancing was used.
Ron
Addresses:
FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@..., timg@...
Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... davemucha@... [Moderators]
URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto: aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if you have trouble.
http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
bill
List Mom
List Owner
Yahoo! Groups Links
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
Brian Fairey
1999-08-01 04:17:17 UTC
Z axis drive
Dan Falck
1999-08-01 05:32:47 UTC
Re: Z axis drive
Ron Ginger
2006-01-05 05:02:28 UTC
Z axis drive
Les Newell
2006-01-05 05:20:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Z axis drive
Ken Strauss
2006-01-05 05:51:47 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Z axis drive
kmslinda
2006-01-05 08:00:39 UTC
Re: Z axis drive
Anders Wallin
2006-01-05 08:22:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Z axis drive
Jon Elson
2006-01-05 09:45:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Z axis drive
Art Eckstein
2006-01-05 10:14:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Z axis drive
jesse Brennan
2006-01-05 11:16:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Z axis drive
n1ych
2006-01-05 13:44:17 UTC
Re: Z axis drive
Anders Wallin
2006-01-05 13:55:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Z axis drive
kmslinda
2006-01-05 14:24:59 UTC
Re: Z axis drive
kmslinda
2006-01-05 14:30:26 UTC
Re: Z axis drive
spc_aux
2006-01-05 15:53:23 UTC
Re: Z axis drive
JCullins
2006-01-05 17:51:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Z axis drive
Ron Ginger
2006-01-05 18:35:45 UTC
Re: Z axis drive
skykotech
2006-01-05 20:44:06 UTC
Re: Z axis drive
gary
2006-01-05 21:37:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Z axis drive
spc_aux
2006-01-06 05:50:46 UTC
Re: Z axis drive
spc_aux
2006-01-06 05:55:58 UTC
Re: Z axis drive
skykotech
2006-01-06 08:02:41 UTC
Re: Z axis drive
gary
2006-01-06 08:58:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Z axis drive
R Rogers
2006-01-06 10:03:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Z axis drive
spc_aux
2006-01-06 10:47:42 UTC
Re: Z axis drive
George Taylor, IV
2006-01-06 11:17:05 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Z axis drive
R Rogers
2006-01-06 11:57:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Z axis drive
Dan Mauch
2006-01-06 12:05:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Z axis drive
spc_aux
2006-01-06 15:36:34 UTC
Re: Z axis drive
spc_aux
2006-01-06 15:47:47 UTC
Re: Z axis drive
wthomas@g...
2006-01-07 21:35:54 UTC
W.E.T.[CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Z axis drive
gary
2006-01-08 13:54:43 UTC
Re: W.E.T.[CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Z axis drive
longassscreenname
2006-01-14 13:01:17 UTC
Re: Z axis drive