Re: Stereolithography machine
Posted by
Graham Stabler
on 2006-03-26 11:15:30 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Elliot Burke" <elliot@...> wrote:
The imaged
> region would be focused to about a 0.72" patch for roughly 0.001"
> resolution, and step and repeated to cover the whole area.
Sorry I missed this the first time
I'm still not convinced on the power density side but who knows.
Graham
Discussion Thread
Mat
2006-03-25 05:04:46 UTC
Stereolithography machine
skullworks
2006-03-25 16:15:45 UTC
Re: Stereolithography machine
Graham Stabler
2006-03-25 16:32:05 UTC
Re: Stereolithography machine
juan gelt
2006-03-25 17:32:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Stereolithography machine
Alan Marconett
2006-03-25 17:59:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Stereolithography machine
juan gelt
2006-03-25 18:04:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Stereolithography machine
Bob Muse
2006-03-25 18:48:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Stereolithography machine
Dave Halliday
2006-03-25 19:24:02 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Stereolithography machine
Graham Stabler
2006-03-26 01:35:30 UTC
Re: Stereolithography machine
Elliot Burke
2006-03-26 10:39:21 UTC
RE: Re: Stereolithography machine
wthomas@g...
2006-03-26 10:40:31 UTC
W.E.T. [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Stereolithography machine
Graham Stabler
2006-03-26 11:07:41 UTC
W.E.T. [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Stereolithography machine
Graham Stabler
2006-03-26 11:10:08 UTC
Re: Stereolithography machine
Graham Stabler
2006-03-26 11:15:30 UTC
Re: Stereolithography machine
Alan Marconett
2006-03-26 13:09:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Stereolithography machine
Alan Marconett
2006-03-26 13:43:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Stereolithography machine
BRIAN FOLEY
2006-03-26 19:54:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Stereolithography machine
James C. Nugen
2006-03-28 21:36:07 UTC
Re: Stereolithography machine
Graham Stabler
2006-03-29 01:05:33 UTC
Re: Stereolithography machine
BRIAN FOLEY
2006-03-29 02:21:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Stereolithography machine