Re: USBCNC was PICstep
Posted by
Mariss Freimanis
on 2006-05-19 06:27:28 UTC
What's wrong with your G100?
Mariss
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Steve Blackmore <steve@...>
wrote:
Mariss
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Steve Blackmore <steve@...>
wrote:
>step
> On Thu, 18 May 2006 13:39:30 +0100, you wrote:
>
>
> >Any product like that has to be able to get something close to the
> >rates of say the G100 to be viable, especially for servo's. Icant say
> >the 4Mhz the G100 is apparently able to do is realistic, butcertainly
> >250Khz is. The geckodrives are rated at least to that...don't
>
> I've run Gecko's and steppers as a test higher than that, but I
> know how they would perform running a machine. I'll let you know ifI
> get the parts to fix my G100 :(
>
> Steve Blackmore
> --
>
Discussion Thread
Dennis Schmitz
2006-05-18 01:44:37 UTC
PICstep Was: Interface. Gauging interest.
Wayne Weedon
2006-05-18 03:45:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] PICstep Was: Interface. Gauging interest.
turbulatordude
2006-05-18 04:51:20 UTC
Re: USBCNC was PICstep
Dennis Schmitz
2006-05-18 04:55:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] PICstep Was: Interface. Gauging interest.
Wayne Weedon
2006-05-18 05:32:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: USBCNC was PICstep
Steve Blackmore
2006-05-18 16:41:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: USBCNC was PICstep
Mariss Freimanis
2006-05-19 06:27:28 UTC
Re: USBCNC was PICstep