Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: USBCNC was PICstep
Posted by
Steve Blackmore
on 2006-05-18 16:41:52 UTC
On Thu, 18 May 2006 13:39:30 +0100, you wrote:
know how they would perform running a machine. I'll let you know if I
get the parts to fix my G100 :(
Steve Blackmore
--
>Any product like that has to be able to get something close to the stepI've run Gecko's and steppers as a test higher than that, but I don't
>rates of say the G100 to be viable, especially for servo's. I cant say
>the 4Mhz the G100 is apparently able to do is realistic, but certainly
>250Khz is. The geckodrives are rated at least to that...
know how they would perform running a machine. I'll let you know if I
get the parts to fix my G100 :(
Steve Blackmore
--
Discussion Thread
Dennis Schmitz
2006-05-18 01:44:37 UTC
PICstep Was: Interface. Gauging interest.
Wayne Weedon
2006-05-18 03:45:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] PICstep Was: Interface. Gauging interest.
turbulatordude
2006-05-18 04:51:20 UTC
Re: USBCNC was PICstep
Dennis Schmitz
2006-05-18 04:55:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] PICstep Was: Interface. Gauging interest.
Wayne Weedon
2006-05-18 05:32:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: USBCNC was PICstep
Steve Blackmore
2006-05-18 16:41:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: USBCNC was PICstep
Mariss Freimanis
2006-05-19 06:27:28 UTC
Re: USBCNC was PICstep