Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: USBCNC was PICstep
    Posted by
    
      Steve Blackmore
    
  
  
    on 2006-05-18 16:41:52 UTC
  
  On Thu, 18 May 2006 13:39:30 +0100, you wrote:
know how they would perform running a machine. I'll let you know if I
get the parts to fix my G100 :(
Steve Blackmore
--
>Any product like that has to be able to get something close to the stepI've run Gecko's and steppers as a test higher than that, but I don't
>rates of say the G100 to be viable, especially for servo's. I cant say
>the 4Mhz the G100 is apparently able to do is realistic, but certainly
>250Khz is. The geckodrives are rated at least to that...
know how they would perform running a machine. I'll let you know if I
get the parts to fix my G100 :(
Steve Blackmore
--
Discussion Thread
  
    Dennis Schmitz
  
2006-05-18 01:44:37 UTC
  PICstep Was: Interface. Gauging interest.
  
    Wayne Weedon
  
2006-05-18 03:45:28 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] PICstep Was: Interface. Gauging interest.
  
    turbulatordude
  
2006-05-18 04:51:20 UTC
  Re: USBCNC was PICstep
  
    Dennis Schmitz
  
2006-05-18 04:55:25 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] PICstep Was: Interface. Gauging interest.
  
    Wayne Weedon
  
2006-05-18 05:32:26 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: USBCNC was PICstep
  
    Steve Blackmore
  
2006-05-18 16:41:52 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: USBCNC was PICstep
  
    Mariss Freimanis
  
2006-05-19 06:27:28 UTC
  Re: USBCNC was PICstep