CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: USBCNC was PICstep

on 2006-05-18 16:41:52 UTC
On Thu, 18 May 2006 13:39:30 +0100, you wrote:


>Any product like that has to be able to get something close to the step
>rates of say the G100 to be viable, especially for servo's. I cant say
>the 4Mhz the G100 is apparently able to do is realistic, but certainly
>250Khz is. The geckodrives are rated at least to that...

I've run Gecko's and steppers as a test higher than that, but I don't
know how they would perform running a machine. I'll let you know if I
get the parts to fix my G100 :(

Steve Blackmore
--

Discussion Thread

Dennis Schmitz 2006-05-18 01:44:37 UTC PICstep Was: Interface. Gauging interest. Wayne Weedon 2006-05-18 03:45:28 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] PICstep Was: Interface. Gauging interest. turbulatordude 2006-05-18 04:51:20 UTC Re: USBCNC was PICstep Dennis Schmitz 2006-05-18 04:55:25 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] PICstep Was: Interface. Gauging interest. Wayne Weedon 2006-05-18 05:32:26 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: USBCNC was PICstep Steve Blackmore 2006-05-18 16:41:52 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: USBCNC was PICstep Mariss Freimanis 2006-05-19 06:27:28 UTC Re: USBCNC was PICstep