Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] TurboCNC
Posted by
Tom Hubin
on 2006-05-23 09:01:55 UTC
wanliker@... wrote:
Hello Bill,
The direction line does not matter. The line is high for one direction
and low for the opposite direction. Which level results in positive or
negative travel direction depends on stepper wiring and mechanical
linkage. So it is best to just try it and then change it if necessary.
For the answer to your clock question, I will leave that to others who
are familiar with your hardware.
However, I will comment on nomenclature. It is unfortunate that many
descibe clocks as active high or active low. Clocks are usually rising
edge triggered (transition from low to high) or falling edge triggered
(transition from high to low). Clocks are not active during any level.
Tom Hubin
thubin@...
> In TurboCNC settings, are the Step and Direction settings supposed to*******************************
> be Logic High or Logic low, when used with the Xylotex drive?
> Does a opto isolator breakout board change this?
> Thanks,
> bill
Hello Bill,
The direction line does not matter. The line is high for one direction
and low for the opposite direction. Which level results in positive or
negative travel direction depends on stepper wiring and mechanical
linkage. So it is best to just try it and then change it if necessary.
For the answer to your clock question, I will leave that to others who
are familiar with your hardware.
However, I will comment on nomenclature. It is unfortunate that many
descibe clocks as active high or active low. Clocks are usually rising
edge triggered (transition from low to high) or falling edge triggered
(transition from high to low). Clocks are not active during any level.
Tom Hubin
thubin@...
Discussion Thread
cnc002@a...
2001-05-03 07:50:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] TurboCNC
dkowalcz@i...
2001-05-03 17:47:24 UTC
Re: TurboCNC
Marty Escarcega
2001-05-03 19:38:09 UTC
Thoughts on PC Based Control Retrofit....pictures of the specimen
Marty Escarcega
2001-05-03 19:59:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Thoughts on PC Based Control Retrofit....pictures of the specimen
Matt Shaver
2001-05-03 21:18:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Thoughts on PC Based Control Retrofit....pictures of the specimen
Tim Goldstein
2001-05-03 21:40:02 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Thoughts on PC Based Control Retrofit....pictures of the specimen
Matt Shaver
2001-05-03 22:46:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Thoughts on PC Based Control Retrofit....pictures of the specimen
Tim Goldstein
2001-05-03 23:08:42 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Thoughts on PC Based Control Retrofit....pictures of the specimen
Marty Escarcega
2001-05-04 06:19:24 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Thoughts on PC Based Control Retrofit....pictures of the specimen
Joel Jacobs
2001-05-04 07:53:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Thoughts on PC Based Control Retrofit....pictures of the specimen
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2001-05-04 15:15:10 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: TurboCNC
cnc002@a...
2001-05-05 07:00:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: TurboCNC
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2001-05-05 09:21:04 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: TurboCNC
dkowalcz@i...
2001-05-05 19:42:45 UTC
Re: TurboCNC
cnc002@a...
2001-05-06 06:54:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: TurboCNC
cnc002@a...
2001-05-06 07:00:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: TurboCNC
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2001-05-06 17:56:21 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: TurboCNC
dkowalcz@i...
2001-05-07 06:12:49 UTC
Re: TurboCNC
Doug Fortune
2001-05-07 07:48:52 UTC
TurboCNC
cnc002@a...
2001-05-07 07:50:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: TurboCNC
mgrady
2001-05-08 03:55:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: TurboCNC
ballendo@y...
2001-05-08 04:14:20 UTC
Re: TurboCNC
Tim Goldstein
2002-03-07 00:10:37 UTC
TurboCNC
wanliker@a...
2006-05-22 23:39:45 UTC
TurboCNC
Dave Kowalczyk
2006-05-23 07:59:00 UTC
Re: TurboCNC
Tom Hubin
2006-05-23 09:01:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] TurboCNC
wanliker@a...
2006-05-23 10:59:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: TurboCNC
wanliker@a...
2006-05-23 11:04:27 UTC
TurboCNC