CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Comments on this new CNC

Posted by Jon Elson
on 2007-03-31 20:15:29 UTC
Philip Burman wrote:
> ISO50 sounds a bit OTT for a 170kg machine. The spec also says
> spindle taper 1:10, ISO50 is 7:24. Have I missed something.
Something is missing, alright! Good catch, I did miss it.
There is NO WAY that machine has an ISO50 spindle taper on it,
just from the pictures. Quill diameter is listed at 70 mm,
no way they could get a size 50 taper in the spindle and still
have room for bearings. Maybe it has an R-8 or MT2.

Also, odd that the table "effective length is 450 mm (17.7")
but the travel is only 230 mm (9"). Unless "effective" length
includes the MOTOR and coupling?

Jon

Discussion Thread

WT 2007-03-31 00:49:51 UTC Comments on this new CNC John Hansford 2007-03-31 01:54:40 UTC Re: Comments on this new CNC Philip Burman 2007-03-31 02:15:21 UTC Re: Comments on this new CNC WT 2007-03-31 06:29:38 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Comments on this new CNC WT 2007-03-31 07:22:34 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Comments on this new CNC Ron Kline 2007-03-31 08:28:35 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Comments on this new CNC Brad 2007-03-31 10:00:56 UTC Re: Comments on this new CNC fortino tan 2007-03-31 11:33:56 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Comments on this new CNC Steve Blackmore 2007-03-31 14:48:55 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Comments on this new CNC Jon Elson 2007-03-31 20:06:45 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comments on this new CNC Jon Elson 2007-03-31 20:15:29 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Comments on this new CNC Peter Homann 2007-03-31 23:42:44 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comments on this new CNC Steve Blackmore 2007-04-01 00:55:09 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comments on this new CNC Jon Elson 2007-04-01 09:55:21 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comments on this new CNC Gerald 2007-04-01 11:08:47 UTC Re: Comments on this new CNC Peter Homann 2007-04-01 15:01:15 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comments on this new CNC