CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comments on this new CNC

on 2007-04-01 00:55:09 UTC
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 22:10:21 -0600, you wrote:


>I started out being impressed until I did some metric-Imperial
>conversions. This thing only has 9" of X travel and 5" of Y
>travel. You get 1 inch more Y ravel, but less X travel than a
>mini-mill.

Same as any other mini mill with an X axis motor stuck on the end like
that. The large mounting plate and connector restricts the x axis total
movement.

I folded my X axis motor back and used 1:1 belt drive, it gets around
that restriction and reduces the overall width considerably.

Steve Blackmore
--

Discussion Thread

WT 2007-03-31 00:49:51 UTC Comments on this new CNC John Hansford 2007-03-31 01:54:40 UTC Re: Comments on this new CNC Philip Burman 2007-03-31 02:15:21 UTC Re: Comments on this new CNC WT 2007-03-31 06:29:38 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Comments on this new CNC WT 2007-03-31 07:22:34 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Comments on this new CNC Ron Kline 2007-03-31 08:28:35 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Comments on this new CNC Brad 2007-03-31 10:00:56 UTC Re: Comments on this new CNC fortino tan 2007-03-31 11:33:56 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Comments on this new CNC Steve Blackmore 2007-03-31 14:48:55 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Comments on this new CNC Jon Elson 2007-03-31 20:06:45 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comments on this new CNC Jon Elson 2007-03-31 20:15:29 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Comments on this new CNC Peter Homann 2007-03-31 23:42:44 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comments on this new CNC Steve Blackmore 2007-04-01 00:55:09 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comments on this new CNC Jon Elson 2007-04-01 09:55:21 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comments on this new CNC Gerald 2007-04-01 11:08:47 UTC Re: Comments on this new CNC Peter Homann 2007-04-01 15:01:15 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comments on this new CNC