Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Closed-loop steppers, was: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Posted by
Michael Fagan
on 2007-08-01 13:06:28 UTC
Right again,
I think I'll just leave it up to people with just a bit more experience in
this area
I completely forgot about the limitations of the serial connector (drat...I
had a cool project with that, but it looks like I'm back to the
drawing board on that one)
Thanks for keeping me on the straight and narrow
I think I'll just leave it up to people with just a bit more experience in
this area
I completely forgot about the limitations of the serial connector (drat...I
had a cool project with that, but it looks like I'm back to the
drawing board on that one)
Thanks for keeping me on the straight and narrow
On 8/1/07, Jon Elson <elson@...> wrote:
>
> Michael Fagan wrote:
> >
> > Right. I knew about the balls (I've got a set on the BP) but I didn't
> know
> > how they gathered data from them. I know they are advertised to have a
> > faster "refresh rate" than optical ones but other than that I don't know
> the
> > exact specs.
> > The newall dro unit does have a serial port output on the back that
> gives
> > real inch measurements for each axis regularly (don't know the exact
> timing)
> > so I think it can be interfaced for some things.
> I don't know how the Newall can have a FASTER refresh than
> direct-reading optical encoders. Most can produce 100,000
> quadrature counts per second with ease, and many of the models
> have a high speed readout option, mostly just faster
> differential line drivers. Then, they can go to 250,000
> counts/second and higher. If they are comparing their
> interpolator to other interpolated scales, then I think they are
> playing word games, as well as comparing what they make NOW with
> what others made 20 years ago. I know some of the outboard
> interpolators (Renishaw, Heidenhain, etc.) can go to several
> hundred thousand counts/second without introducing lag.
>
> The serial output is definitely going to be limited to a few
> hundred updates a second. 9600 Baud is roughly 1000 characters
> a second. If you are reading out 3 axes with 6 digits each, or
> 18 digits at 1000 chars/sec, that is 55 full updates a second,
> neglecting any format chars to tell which is which. Again,
> totally useless for a servo system, unless your bandwidth is
> about one Hz. That would be about as sluggish as your watching
> a display and moving by hand.
>
> Jon
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
scyvt
2007-07-17 11:00:44 UTC
breakout boards plus - hard choice
technical_ducati
2007-07-17 11:15:04 UTC
Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Michael Fagan
2007-07-17 12:00:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] breakout boards plus - hard choice
caudlet
2007-07-17 15:49:41 UTC
Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
scyvt
2007-07-18 04:23:56 UTC
Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
turbulatordude
2007-07-18 07:38:46 UTC
Re: breakout boards - LINKS section
Jon Elson
2007-07-18 10:15:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
scyvt
2007-07-18 12:31:59 UTC
Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Jon Elson
2007-07-18 18:52:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Graham Stabler
2007-07-19 02:41:07 UTC
Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Mark Vaughan
2007-07-19 03:27:43 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Peter Homann
2007-07-19 03:46:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Graham Stabler
2007-07-19 04:17:28 UTC
Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
turbulatordude
2007-07-19 06:09:21 UTC
Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Graham Stabler
2007-07-19 06:36:00 UTC
Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Mark Vaughan
2007-07-19 09:10:13 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
R Rogers
2007-07-19 10:14:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Jon Elson
2007-07-19 10:17:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Mark Vaughan
2007-07-19 10:54:28 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Dan Mauch
2007-07-19 10:56:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Mark Vaughan
2007-07-19 11:06:41 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
R Rogers
2007-07-19 12:04:14 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Mark Vaughan
2007-07-19 12:43:28 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Peter Homann
2007-07-19 16:11:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
R Rogers
2007-07-19 16:16:43 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Paul Kelly
2007-07-19 18:21:51 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Peter Homann
2007-07-19 18:26:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Jon Elson
2007-07-19 18:32:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Jon Elson
2007-07-19 18:35:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Mark Vaughan
2007-07-20 00:29:17 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Mark Stacey
2007-07-20 02:36:28 UTC
Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Khanh-Vu
2007-07-20 09:07:25 UTC
NEED MANUAL FOR ROBOFIL 552
Jon Elson
2007-07-20 09:12:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
R Rogers
2007-07-20 09:33:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Henrik Olsson
2007-07-20 10:02:32 UTC
SV: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Jon Elson
2007-07-20 19:25:37 UTC
Re: SV: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Mark Vaughan
2007-07-21 01:21:05 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Mark Vaughan
2007-07-21 01:24:13 UTC
RE: SV: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
David G. LeVine
2007-07-21 10:06:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
scyvt
2007-07-31 04:47:30 UTC
Closed-loop steppers, was: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Jon Elson
2007-07-31 10:11:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Closed-loop steppers, was: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Michael Fagan
2007-07-31 10:50:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Closed-loop steppers, was: breakout boards plus - hard choice
scyvt
2007-07-31 14:52:37 UTC
Re: Closed-loop steppers, was: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Jon Elson
2007-07-31 17:31:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Closed-loop steppers, was: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Jon Elson
2007-07-31 17:39:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Closed-loop steppers, was: breakout boards plus - hard choice
scyvt
2007-08-01 04:57:45 UTC
Re: Closed-loop steppers, was: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Michael Fagan
2007-08-01 08:10:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Closed-loop steppers, was: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Jon Elson
2007-08-01 10:05:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Closed-loop steppers, was: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Jon Elson
2007-08-01 10:14:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Closed-loop steppers, was: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Michael Fagan
2007-08-01 13:06:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Closed-loop steppers, was: breakout boards plus - hard choice