CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Closed-loop steppers, was: breakout boards plus - hard choice

Posted by Michael Fagan
on 2007-08-01 13:06:28 UTC
Right again,
I think I'll just leave it up to people with just a bit more experience in
this area
I completely forgot about the limitations of the serial connector (drat...I
had a cool project with that, but it looks like I'm back to the
drawing board on that one)

Thanks for keeping me on the straight and narrow


On 8/1/07, Jon Elson <elson@...> wrote:
>
> Michael Fagan wrote:
> >
> > Right. I knew about the balls (I've got a set on the BP) but I didn't
> know
> > how they gathered data from them. I know they are advertised to have a
> > faster "refresh rate" than optical ones but other than that I don't know
> the
> > exact specs.
> > The newall dro unit does have a serial port output on the back that
> gives
> > real inch measurements for each axis regularly (don't know the exact
> timing)
> > so I think it can be interfaced for some things.
> I don't know how the Newall can have a FASTER refresh than
> direct-reading optical encoders. Most can produce 100,000
> quadrature counts per second with ease, and many of the models
> have a high speed readout option, mostly just faster
> differential line drivers. Then, they can go to 250,000
> counts/second and higher. If they are comparing their
> interpolator to other interpolated scales, then I think they are
> playing word games, as well as comparing what they make NOW with
> what others made 20 years ago. I know some of the outboard
> interpolators (Renishaw, Heidenhain, etc.) can go to several
> hundred thousand counts/second without introducing lag.
>
> The serial output is definitely going to be limited to a few
> hundred updates a second. 9600 Baud is roughly 1000 characters
> a second. If you are reading out 3 axes with 6 digits each, or
> 18 digits at 1000 chars/sec, that is 55 full updates a second,
> neglecting any format chars to tell which is which. Again,
> totally useless for a servo system, unless your bandwidth is
> about one Hz. That would be about as sluggish as your watching
> a display and moving by hand.
>
> Jon
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Discussion Thread

scyvt 2007-07-17 11:00:44 UTC breakout boards plus - hard choice technical_ducati 2007-07-17 11:15:04 UTC Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice Michael Fagan 2007-07-17 12:00:37 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] breakout boards plus - hard choice caudlet 2007-07-17 15:49:41 UTC Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice scyvt 2007-07-18 04:23:56 UTC Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice turbulatordude 2007-07-18 07:38:46 UTC Re: breakout boards - LINKS section Jon Elson 2007-07-18 10:15:11 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice scyvt 2007-07-18 12:31:59 UTC Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice Jon Elson 2007-07-18 18:52:24 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice Graham Stabler 2007-07-19 02:41:07 UTC Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice Mark Vaughan 2007-07-19 03:27:43 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice Peter Homann 2007-07-19 03:46:57 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice Graham Stabler 2007-07-19 04:17:28 UTC Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice turbulatordude 2007-07-19 06:09:21 UTC Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice Graham Stabler 2007-07-19 06:36:00 UTC Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice Mark Vaughan 2007-07-19 09:10:13 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice R Rogers 2007-07-19 10:14:22 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice Jon Elson 2007-07-19 10:17:49 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice Mark Vaughan 2007-07-19 10:54:28 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice Dan Mauch 2007-07-19 10:56:49 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice Mark Vaughan 2007-07-19 11:06:41 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice R Rogers 2007-07-19 12:04:14 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice Mark Vaughan 2007-07-19 12:43:28 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice Peter Homann 2007-07-19 16:11:27 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice R Rogers 2007-07-19 16:16:43 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice Paul Kelly 2007-07-19 18:21:51 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice Peter Homann 2007-07-19 18:26:19 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice Jon Elson 2007-07-19 18:32:53 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice Jon Elson 2007-07-19 18:35:28 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice Mark Vaughan 2007-07-20 00:29:17 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice Mark Stacey 2007-07-20 02:36:28 UTC Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice Khanh-Vu 2007-07-20 09:07:25 UTC NEED MANUAL FOR ROBOFIL 552 Jon Elson 2007-07-20 09:12:05 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice R Rogers 2007-07-20 09:33:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice Henrik Olsson 2007-07-20 10:02:32 UTC SV: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice Jon Elson 2007-07-20 19:25:37 UTC Re: SV: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice Mark Vaughan 2007-07-21 01:21:05 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice Mark Vaughan 2007-07-21 01:24:13 UTC RE: SV: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice David G. LeVine 2007-07-21 10:06:23 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice scyvt 2007-07-31 04:47:30 UTC Closed-loop steppers, was: breakout boards plus - hard choice Jon Elson 2007-07-31 10:11:20 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Closed-loop steppers, was: breakout boards plus - hard choice Michael Fagan 2007-07-31 10:50:21 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Closed-loop steppers, was: breakout boards plus - hard choice scyvt 2007-07-31 14:52:37 UTC Re: Closed-loop steppers, was: breakout boards plus - hard choice Jon Elson 2007-07-31 17:31:39 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Closed-loop steppers, was: breakout boards plus - hard choice Jon Elson 2007-07-31 17:39:10 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Closed-loop steppers, was: breakout boards plus - hard choice scyvt 2007-08-01 04:57:45 UTC Re: Closed-loop steppers, was: breakout boards plus - hard choice Michael Fagan 2007-08-01 08:10:27 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Closed-loop steppers, was: breakout boards plus - hard choice Jon Elson 2007-08-01 10:05:13 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Closed-loop steppers, was: breakout boards plus - hard choice Jon Elson 2007-08-01 10:14:09 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Closed-loop steppers, was: breakout boards plus - hard choice Michael Fagan 2007-08-01 13:06:28 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Closed-loop steppers, was: breakout boards plus - hard choice