Re: New group idea {possible change in rules from list...

First...a concession on my part...I should have said
"SOME on the CCED"...my apologies.

If those concerned will go back and read post #93903.

That's the point it became an "issue", for lack of
a better word. There was no need for CCED to consider
a change in list rules....

"Re: New group idea {possible change in rules from list owner}"

Its a "Yahoo group" of all things. There are LOTS of
them....take it or leave it. But Definitely Not a
reason for a long established group to even consider
changing it's rules.

That alone indicates the idea for the new group is valid.

The only thing I know to do is support it or ignore it.
Not bad choices either way.

John

--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@... wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 10/10/2007 8:04:33 A.M. Mountain Daylight Time,
> kz1927@... writes:
>
> Or do I say the CCED doesn't like that a member went
> off on his own and started a Yahoo group?
> That's the truthful answer.
>
>
>
> John, I am sorry, but I don't think that CCED really cares if you
start
> another group or not, many others have started groups after being in
CCED, for
> what ever there reason was, and I can't recall that at any time that
"CCED" was
> against it.
> I pointed out that on the bottom of every post that there is a
sister group
> that already carry's, a lot of what is deemed "Off Topic" for the
CCED group.
>
> Personally, if you think your new group serves a purpose, then by
all means
> keep it active, but please don't blame it on CCED if you decide to
close it.
> Because I don't think that is fair to the CCED group.
>
> Thank You,
> bill
> List Mom
>
>
>
> ************************************** See what's new at
http://www.aol.com
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>