Re: New group idea {possible change in rules from list...

--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "John Hansford" <kz1927@...>
wrote:

>
> First...a concession on my part...I should have said
> "SOME on the CCED"...my apologies.
>
> If those concerned will go back and read post #93903.
>
> That's the point it became an "issue", for lack of
> a better word. There was no need for CCED to consider
> a change in list rules....
>
> "Re: New group idea {possible change in rules from list owner}"
>
> Its a "Yahoo group" of all things. There are LOTS of
> them....take it or leave it. But Definitely Not a
> reason for a long established group to even consider
> changing it's rules.
>
> That alone indicates the idea for the new group is valid.
>
> The only thing I know to do is support it or ignore it.
> Not bad choices either way.
>
> John
>

I really don't see the problem, you had only just started the group
and another option was offered, that is not being against your group,
you yourself might have preferred to include a few more topics in CCED
than have another group.

The new group will either sink or swim, it's evolution, if it swims
then that's that.

Graham