Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Remember Mr. Bill's servo lite?

On 01/15/2012 02:44 AM, robin wrote:

> Why is #1 necessarily more dangerous? I could think up scenarios, especially if one side of the secondary is NOT grounded, where #2 would give more chance of a dangerous electrical shock. But let's assume one side of the secondary is #2 IS grounded. Why is it safer to have the isolation transformer?
> >
> >
> > Andy Wander

Circulating ground currents can cause no end of grief in electronic
equipment.

Dave 8{)

--
/"Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional,
illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream
media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to
pick up a turd by the clean end."/
(quoted from http://www.wattflyer.com/forums/showthread.php?t=30060)

NOTE TO ALL:


When forwarding emails, please use only "Blind Carbon Copy" or "Bcc" for
all recipients. Please "delete" or "highlight & cut" any forwarding
history which includes my email address! It is a courtesy to me and
others who may not wish to have their email addresses sent all over the
world! Erasing the history helps prevent Spammers from mining addresses
and viruses from being propagated.

THANK YOU!


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]