RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: small spindle ?
Posted by
Jeffrey T. Birt
on 2012-06-17 10:50:39 UTC
How run-out is rated depends on the manufacturer. Some (like PreciseBits)
actually do 100% testing so you know what you are getting; they also use a
fancy laser micrometer that gives you simultaneous three axis measurements.
While run-out does affect the precision of the cut it also has a HUGE impact
on bit life and some on spindle bearings. For some types of work, like
engraving or PCB milling high run-out can ruin your work. Take a look at:
http://precisebits.com/faqs/breaking_bits.htm
http://precisebits.com/tutorials/coletcareprocedure.htm
http://precisebits.com/tutorials/spindle_runout.htm
I have a customer not too far from here that cuts primarily balsa wood and
aircraft plywood. After suggesting several times that he consider upgrading
the router motor he was using he finally switched over to a Bosh Colt and
the PreciseBits collets. He was immediately very impressed with the
difference, better quality of cuts and the Colt was quieter than his old
router too. The real pay-off came over time though. He now buys ½ the number
of bits from me as they are lasting twice as long.
There is a lot of hype in the hobby CNC world, things like ball screws take
on the mythical quality that billet accessories do in the automotive
enthusiast world. The problems associated with run-out are indeed fact
though, it just comes down to physics of the matter.
Jeff Birt
Soigeneris.com
From: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of turbulatordude
Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2012 9:26 AM
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: small spindle ?
DARN DECIMALS.....
if you make one at 0.0001 and 99 at 0.002
you have one great one, 99 average.
do you advertise 0.0001" or 0.002"
best practice would be to separate that great one, sell it for more $$ and
be honest in the advertising.
The next real question is that of needed run-out. how many machines and
parts do we all have that are
#1) capable of cutting to 0.001"
#2) have parts that require such accuracy.
Dave
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO%40yahoogroups.com> , "Tony Smith" <ajsmith1968@...>
wrote:
actually do 100% testing so you know what you are getting; they also use a
fancy laser micrometer that gives you simultaneous three axis measurements.
While run-out does affect the precision of the cut it also has a HUGE impact
on bit life and some on spindle bearings. For some types of work, like
engraving or PCB milling high run-out can ruin your work. Take a look at:
http://precisebits.com/faqs/breaking_bits.htm
http://precisebits.com/tutorials/coletcareprocedure.htm
http://precisebits.com/tutorials/spindle_runout.htm
I have a customer not too far from here that cuts primarily balsa wood and
aircraft plywood. After suggesting several times that he consider upgrading
the router motor he was using he finally switched over to a Bosh Colt and
the PreciseBits collets. He was immediately very impressed with the
difference, better quality of cuts and the Colt was quieter than his old
router too. The real pay-off came over time though. He now buys ½ the number
of bits from me as they are lasting twice as long.
There is a lot of hype in the hobby CNC world, things like ball screws take
on the mythical quality that billet accessories do in the automotive
enthusiast world. The problems associated with run-out are indeed fact
though, it just comes down to physics of the matter.
Jeff Birt
Soigeneris.com
From: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of turbulatordude
Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2012 9:26 AM
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: small spindle ?
DARN DECIMALS.....
if you make one at 0.0001 and 99 at 0.002
you have one great one, 99 average.
do you advertise 0.0001" or 0.002"
best practice would be to separate that great one, sell it for more $$ and
be honest in the advertising.
The next real question is that of needed run-out. how many machines and
parts do we all have that are
#1) capable of cutting to 0.001"
#2) have parts that require such accuracy.
Dave
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO%40yahoogroups.com> , "Tony Smith" <ajsmith1968@...>
wrote:
>view.
> > the real question is the person selling the parts and their point of
> if theyhave
> > make 100 parts and the absolute worst has a run-out of 0.0015 and 99
> > run-out of 0.0002, do they claim 0.0015"then
> >
> > if they make 99 that are 0.0015 and one that is 0.0002, do they claim
> 0.0002 ?
> >
> > modern sales would say they have shop-grade and sell at one price and
> QCtesting),
> > grade and sell for more.
>
>
> I'd sell 'em as 0.0002 +/- 0.0005, but maybe that's just me.
>
> Joking aside, you make to the highest quality and then sell the 'failures'
> at a lower grade.
>
> This leads to oddities at times, sometimes you find lower grade items that
> actually meet the spec for the next grade up. It may cost the same to make
> the part regardless of grade (often the only real difference is in
> so if they have a 'good day' they'll downgrade some parts to meet thesupply
> for the lower grade. Marketing does strange things to people.a
>
> That happens with computer CPUs occasionally. They all come off the same
> production line, and are graded according to speed. Sometimes you can
> 'overclock' a low grade part to a higher speed. Sometimes it's even
> reliable.
>
> You get a different phenomenon with parts like resistors. They're made to
> certain value, and specified with a tolerance, usually 5% or 1%. So if you95-105
> buy a roll of 100 ohm 5% resistors, you should find values across the
> ohm range. You will, however, fail to find any in the 99-101 ohm range.[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> The reason? Well, guess where the 1% range comes from...
>
> Ferrari, on the other hand, toss the duds back into the smelter.
>
> Tony
>
Discussion Thread
turbulatordude
2012-05-02 04:10:19 UTC
small spindle ?
Ron Thompson
2012-05-02 04:24:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] small spindle ?
Peter Homann
2012-05-02 05:02:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] small spindle ?
Art Eckstein
2012-05-02 05:51:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] small spindle ?
Andy Wander
2012-05-02 05:53:48 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] small spindle ?
Jon Elson
2012-05-02 07:58:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] small spindle ?
Randy Abernathy
2012-05-02 08:38:17 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] small spindle ?
David G. LeVine
2012-05-02 13:47:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] small spindle ?
turbulatordude
2012-05-02 15:57:22 UTC
Re: small spindle ?
VicS
2012-05-05 13:34:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] small spindle ?
Bob
2012-05-14 11:04:35 UTC
Re: small spindle ?
Jeffrey T. Birt
2012-05-14 17:02:06 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: small spindle ?
LJG
2012-06-07 15:04:30 UTC
Re: small spindle ?
Jeffrey T. Birt
2012-06-08 08:12:38 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: small spindle ?
Larry Guthrie
2012-06-08 16:04:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: small spindle ?
Jeffrey T. Birt
2012-06-08 19:24:38 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: small spindle ?
Jeffrey T. Birt
2012-06-08 20:46:11 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: small spindle ?
556RECON
2012-06-08 23:06:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: small spindle ?
Roland Jollivet
2012-06-09 06:45:58 UTC
[CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: small spindle ?
Craig Carmichael
2012-06-09 09:16:40 UTC
Mendel Reprap 3D Printer ?
Jamie Cunningham
2012-06-09 09:29:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Mendel Reprap 3D Printer ?
Tobias Gogolin
2012-06-09 13:36:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Mendel Reprap 3D Printer ?
Jack
2012-06-09 14:01:22 UTC
Re: Mendel Reprap 3D Printer ?
Craig Carmichael
2012-06-09 21:43:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Mendel Reprap 3D Printer ?
Larry Guthrie
2012-06-11 20:10:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: small spindle ?
Drew
2012-06-11 20:10:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Mendel Reprap 3D Printer ?
Drew
2012-06-11 20:10:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Mendel Reprap 3D Printer ?
David G. LeVine
2012-06-12 05:42:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: small spindle ?
Craig Carmichael
2012-06-12 09:48:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Mendel Reprap 3D Printer ?
Larry Guthrie
2012-06-16 04:52:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: small spindle ?
turbulatordude
2012-06-16 05:00:31 UTC
Re: small spindle ?
douglas pollard
2012-06-16 11:00:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: small spindle ?
Tony Smith
2012-06-16 12:31:51 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: small spindle ?
turbulatordude
2012-06-17 07:25:47 UTC
Re: small spindle ?
Jeffrey T. Birt
2012-06-17 10:50:39 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: small spindle ?
Tony Smith
2012-06-17 14:36:16 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: small spindle ?