Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
Posted by
Hannu Venermo
on 2014-06-03 09:46:21 UTC
Tony .. sometimes you dont come across as positive, thoughtful, or pleasant.
You also keep adding crap to posts, and making interferences where none
exist.
I hope its not intentional.
(The re: to price vs accuracy.
I never mentioned price - just that the cheap scales are inaccurate, and
how much.)
Accuracy 0.02 mm
Its a crap piece that does not even state over what distance, or that
its +/- the 0.02 mm.
http://www.amazon.com/Neiko-01407A-Extra-Large-SAE-Metric-Conversion/dp/B000GSLKIW/ref=lp_2476630011_1_1?s=industrial&ie=UTF8&qid=1401813648&sr=1-1
Likewise.
http://www.harborfreight.com/6-inch-digital-caliper-47257.html
This one states, correctly, that the accuracy decreases the bigger it gets.
http://www.maplin.co.uk/p/electronic-digital-calliper-n48aa
+/- 0.04 mm/300 mm.
and thus 0.08 over 600 mm.
I have a 600 mm digital cailper, a cheap piece of chinese crap, that has
the 0.08 mm.
Mostly, all instruments have the accuracy data on the package.
On 03/06/2014 11:02, 'Tony Smith' ajsmith1968@...
[CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] wrote:
-hanermo (cnc designs)
You also keep adding crap to posts, and making interferences where none
exist.
I hope its not intentional.
(The re: to price vs accuracy.
I never mentioned price - just that the cheap scales are inaccurate, and
how much.)
Accuracy 0.02 mm
Its a crap piece that does not even state over what distance, or that
its +/- the 0.02 mm.
http://www.amazon.com/Neiko-01407A-Extra-Large-SAE-Metric-Conversion/dp/B000GSLKIW/ref=lp_2476630011_1_1?s=industrial&ie=UTF8&qid=1401813648&sr=1-1
Likewise.
http://www.harborfreight.com/6-inch-digital-caliper-47257.html
This one states, correctly, that the accuracy decreases the bigger it gets.
http://www.maplin.co.uk/p/electronic-digital-calliper-n48aa
+/- 0.04 mm/300 mm.
and thus 0.08 over 600 mm.
I have a 600 mm digital cailper, a cheap piece of chinese crap, that has
the 0.08 mm.
Mostly, all instruments have the accuracy data on the package.
On 03/06/2014 11:02, 'Tony Smith' ajsmith1968@...
[CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] wrote:
> If you have a source for their inaccuracy (apart from your rather--
> fertile imagination) let’s see it. 0.04mm? Hah.
>
> Capacitive scales have two drawbacks – they’re affected by oil & crud
> and have slow-ish data rates (50 readings per second?). Doesn’t stop
> people using them though. The ‘jitter’ people find with those scales
> is power supply problems, usually caused when powered from a DRO
> rather than battery. Or RF, but that happens to everything.
-hanermo (cnc designs)
Discussion Thread
David G. LeVine
2014-06-01 14:52:58 UTC
Positioning
Hannu Venermo
2014-06-02 04:31:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
Tony Smith
2014-06-02 05:55:45 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
Hannu Venermo
2014-06-02 22:08:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
Tony Smith
2014-06-02 22:46:24 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
Hannu Venermo
2014-06-03 01:10:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
Tony Smith
2014-06-03 02:02:35 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
Keith Burton
2014-06-03 03:35:10 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
Tony Smith
2014-06-03 06:40:53 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
Hannu Venermo
2014-06-03 09:46:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
John Anhalt
2014-06-03 10:28:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
Christopher Erickson
2014-06-03 10:31:22 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
CS Mo
2014-06-03 10:38:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
Jon Elson
2014-06-03 11:02:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
CS Mo
2014-06-03 11:19:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
Tony Smith
2014-06-03 12:11:47 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
Andy Wander
2014-06-03 12:42:29 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
Tony Smith
2014-06-03 13:39:23 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
Randall Wink
2014-06-03 14:48:12 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
Jon Elson
2014-06-03 19:42:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
William Thomas
2014-06-03 19:55:50 UTC
[CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
Jon Elson
2014-06-03 21:14:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
William Thomas
2014-06-04 10:30:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
Tony Smith
2014-06-07 10:36:28 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
Hannu Venermo
2014-06-07 10:52:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
Steve Blackmore
2014-06-08 00:42:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
Hannu Venermo
2014-06-08 23:26:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
David G. LeVine
2014-06-09 10:48:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
Steve Blackmore
2014-06-09 15:51:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
David G. LeVine
2014-06-10 22:11:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
Steve Blackmore
2014-06-10 23:32:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
David G. LeVine
2014-06-12 15:55:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
Steve Blackmore
2014-06-12 23:30:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
Christopher Erickson
2014-06-18 15:43:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
Christopher Erickson
2014-06-18 15:44:17 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
Tony Smith
2014-06-18 15:44:45 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
John Anhalt
2014-06-18 15:45:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
ED MAISEY
2014-06-18 15:45:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
Christopher Erickson
2014-06-18 15:45:55 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
David Mannock
2014-06-18 15:46:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning
David G. LeVine
2014-06-20 15:33:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Positioning