Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost steps
Posted by
JanRwl@A...
on 2000-08-21 21:04:54 UTC
In a message dated 8/20/00 10:24:22 PM Central Daylight Time, Ozzie@...
writes:
<< Your first two paragraphs are a bit beyond my knowledge base. I don't
know what circuits properly bypassed means >>
Sorry, I know nothing of proprietary ("store-bought") driver circuits that I
have never had in my own grubby hands.
"Bypassing" is "Electronic-speak" for [bypassing noise to ground], and the
word usually implies that CAPACITORS are connected from each power-supply
line to GROUND. Some DC power-supplies are +5VDC only, and some are such as
+5, +12, -12, and kitchen-sink, pluse "O Volts" (or "ground"). To "bypass",
say, the 5VDC, you would run a 0.1 uf. capacitor from it, generally very
close to the "load", and then directly to ground, via the shortest,
"beefiest" connection you can make (within reason! Not with #4 Kearnies,
but, say, to a "ground track" on the PCB at least 1/4" wide, etc. That is,
not a 1/64" wide "signal track" 4" long from where it last was connected to
such a "beefy" ground.)
Or, some would surely use MUCH more capacitance than that 0.1 uF! That
latter would work only to "bypass" such as "radio-noise" to ground, but if
you had, say, "electrical noise" due to motor-starting, etc., you would want
to use 10 uF or even more, and ALSO a "ceramic" or "mylar" 0.1uF, in
parallel! It's a kinda nebulous thing that lektronik-tinkerers learn with
years of cobbling PC-boards, etc! And, as you should surmise from my
grammar, here, I am NOT a wizard, and some "ol' boy" in this group with more
grey-matter between his ears should answer you, instead of dum' ol' me!!!
(But I'm happy to supply the levity!) Jan Rowland
writes:
<< Your first two paragraphs are a bit beyond my knowledge base. I don't
know what circuits properly bypassed means >>
Sorry, I know nothing of proprietary ("store-bought") driver circuits that I
have never had in my own grubby hands.
"Bypassing" is "Electronic-speak" for [bypassing noise to ground], and the
word usually implies that CAPACITORS are connected from each power-supply
line to GROUND. Some DC power-supplies are +5VDC only, and some are such as
+5, +12, -12, and kitchen-sink, pluse "O Volts" (or "ground"). To "bypass",
say, the 5VDC, you would run a 0.1 uf. capacitor from it, generally very
close to the "load", and then directly to ground, via the shortest,
"beefiest" connection you can make (within reason! Not with #4 Kearnies,
but, say, to a "ground track" on the PCB at least 1/4" wide, etc. That is,
not a 1/64" wide "signal track" 4" long from where it last was connected to
such a "beefy" ground.)
Or, some would surely use MUCH more capacitance than that 0.1 uF! That
latter would work only to "bypass" such as "radio-noise" to ground, but if
you had, say, "electrical noise" due to motor-starting, etc., you would want
to use 10 uF or even more, and ALSO a "ceramic" or "mylar" 0.1uF, in
parallel! It's a kinda nebulous thing that lektronik-tinkerers learn with
years of cobbling PC-boards, etc! And, as you should surmise from my
grammar, here, I am NOT a wizard, and some "ol' boy" in this group with more
grey-matter between his ears should answer you, instead of dum' ol' me!!!
(But I'm happy to supply the levity!) Jan Rowland
Discussion Thread
Tim Goldstein
2000-08-14 10:55:55 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost steps
Joe Vicars
2000-08-15 14:33:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost steps
Ozzie@h...
2000-08-20 13:41:24 UTC
Re: Lost steps
Mariss Freimanis
2000-08-20 15:57:28 UTC
Re: Lost steps
JanRwl@A...
2000-08-20 17:10:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost steps
Ozzie@h...
2000-08-20 20:04:20 UTC
Re: Lost steps
Ozzie@h...
2000-08-20 20:23:39 UTC
Re: Lost steps
Mariss Freimanis
2000-08-20 23:57:26 UTC
Re: Lost steps
Jon Elson
2000-08-21 16:08:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost steps
ptengin@a...
2000-08-21 17:18:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost steps
Ozzie@h...
2000-08-21 20:02:49 UTC
Re: Lost steps
dave engvall
2000-08-21 20:24:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost steps
JanRwl@A...
2000-08-21 21:04:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost steps
Ozzie@h...
2000-08-21 21:47:02 UTC
Re: Lost steps
Ozzie@h...
2000-08-21 22:00:05 UTC
Re: Lost steps
Jon Elson
2000-08-21 23:22:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost steps
ptengin@a...
2000-08-21 23:47:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost steps
Jon Elson
2000-08-22 13:31:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost steps
ptengin@a...
2000-08-22 15:44:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost steps
Mariss Freimanis
2000-08-22 17:17:03 UTC
Re: Lost steps
wanliker@a...
2000-08-22 17:42:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost steps
Mariss Freimanis
2000-08-22 18:37:23 UTC
Re: Lost steps
JanRwl@A...
2000-08-22 21:36:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost steps
Jon Elson
2000-08-22 22:16:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost steps
Ian Wright
2000-08-23 04:19:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost steps
Ozzie@h...
2000-08-23 11:49:05 UTC
Re: Lost steps
Tim Goldstein
2000-08-23 13:19:04 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost steps
hans
2000-08-23 13:49:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost steps
JanRwl@A...
2000-08-23 15:04:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost steps
Ian Wright
2000-08-24 01:08:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost steps