CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: Lost steps

on 2000-08-22 17:17:03 UTC
What may be overlooked here is the intermittent nature of the problem
originally reported.

If you don't want to have a system plagued with noise problems, do
the ground wiring right from the beginning. Right means use the
concept of a "holy point ground". This means ALL ground wires are
returned to a single point; power supply ground, motor drive ground,
parallel port ground, in short if it has a ground wire, take it to
that point! If shields are used, take them there too.

Resist the temptation to "daisy chain" ground wires. It can be
tempting to run a 3" wire from one device to an adjacent one where
otherwise it would be a 3 foot wire run back to the "holy point" You
won't be doing yourself a favor by taking the shortcut.

The whole point is to keep a level playing field. Voltages are always
relative. That is why it takes 2 leads to measure them. For most of
us that means "relative to ground". But what happens if one device's
ground has +/- 2 volts of high-frequency noise on it relative to
another device's ground? It will be added with the signal voltage and
no bypass cap will help there.

A single point ground "levels the field" so every device has the same
point of reference. It really saves a lot of grief.

Mariss


> OK, what Peter is talking about here is putting small value
capacitors
> across the signal inputs (one from signal ground to step in, and one
> from signal ground to direction in) right at the stepper driver
> terminals.
> I would recommend 100 pF (Pico Farads) as a start. This will remove
> extremely short duration noise pulses that are picked up by the
wiring.
>
> Jon

Discussion Thread

Tim Goldstein 2000-08-14 10:55:55 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost steps Joe Vicars 2000-08-15 14:33:28 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost steps Ozzie@h... 2000-08-20 13:41:24 UTC Re: Lost steps Mariss Freimanis 2000-08-20 15:57:28 UTC Re: Lost steps JanRwl@A... 2000-08-20 17:10:24 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost steps Ozzie@h... 2000-08-20 20:04:20 UTC Re: Lost steps Ozzie@h... 2000-08-20 20:23:39 UTC Re: Lost steps Mariss Freimanis 2000-08-20 23:57:26 UTC Re: Lost steps Jon Elson 2000-08-21 16:08:15 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost steps ptengin@a... 2000-08-21 17:18:36 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost steps Ozzie@h... 2000-08-21 20:02:49 UTC Re: Lost steps dave engvall 2000-08-21 20:24:57 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost steps JanRwl@A... 2000-08-21 21:04:54 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost steps Ozzie@h... 2000-08-21 21:47:02 UTC Re: Lost steps Ozzie@h... 2000-08-21 22:00:05 UTC Re: Lost steps Jon Elson 2000-08-21 23:22:44 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost steps ptengin@a... 2000-08-21 23:47:53 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost steps Jon Elson 2000-08-22 13:31:34 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost steps ptengin@a... 2000-08-22 15:44:18 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost steps Mariss Freimanis 2000-08-22 17:17:03 UTC Re: Lost steps wanliker@a... 2000-08-22 17:42:41 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost steps Mariss Freimanis 2000-08-22 18:37:23 UTC Re: Lost steps JanRwl@A... 2000-08-22 21:36:53 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost steps Jon Elson 2000-08-22 22:16:56 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost steps Ian Wright 2000-08-23 04:19:53 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost steps Ozzie@h... 2000-08-23 11:49:05 UTC Re: Lost steps Tim Goldstein 2000-08-23 13:19:04 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost steps hans 2000-08-23 13:49:25 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost steps JanRwl@A... 2000-08-23 15:04:55 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost steps Ian Wright 2000-08-24 01:08:01 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost steps