Re: Re: Re: Black box
Posted by
ballendo@y...
on 2000-10-13 22:44:39 UTC
Matt,
Thanks for the link. It does look like an interesting avenue.
Ballendo
P.S. Since I've run steppers successfully(for years) with 8254 timing
using programs from IndexerLPT to AhHa! to CncPRO to EMC(which is
servicing a GUI) I'm not sure why all this "it CAN'T be done!" It IS
being done! Daily!
What am I missing, here?
Is it just that I'm willing to accept the computer spitting the bits
as a "machine controller"? And not expect CNC to run as a "background
task" while I check my email?!?
Is it that my steps/sec. needs aren't in the >20k/sec. range?
I really think that people ARE willing to have the box "tied up,at
least somewhat" while they are machining. They just want to be able
to use the familiar windows interface. Without a re-boot.
Now editing/importing the next program while one is cutting is nice,
and could be called important; but a "sluggish GUI rate" here is not
likely. Point being, this is a "coasting job" for any modern
processor anyway.
Really, WHAT part of this am I not understanding??
Thanks for the link. It does look like an interesting avenue.
Ballendo
P.S. Since I've run steppers successfully(for years) with 8254 timing
using programs from IndexerLPT to AhHa! to CncPRO to EMC(which is
servicing a GUI) I'm not sure why all this "it CAN'T be done!" It IS
being done! Daily!
What am I missing, here?
Is it just that I'm willing to accept the computer spitting the bits
as a "machine controller"? And not expect CNC to run as a "background
task" while I check my email?!?
Is it that my steps/sec. needs aren't in the >20k/sec. range?
I really think that people ARE willing to have the box "tied up,at
least somewhat" while they are machining. They just want to be able
to use the familiar windows interface. Without a re-boot.
Now editing/importing the next program while one is cutting is nice,
and could be called important; but a "sluggish GUI rate" here is not
likely. Point being, this is a "coasting job" for any modern
processor anyway.
Really, WHAT part of this am I not understanding??
Discussion Thread
Alvaro Fogassa
2000-10-13 00:08:30 UTC
Black box
Tom Caudle
2000-10-13 08:35:43 UTC
Re: Black box
Art Fenerty
2000-10-13 12:18:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Black box
Jon Elson
2000-10-13 16:33:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Black box
ballendo@y...
2000-10-13 18:29:16 UTC
Re: Re: Black box
Matt Shaver
2000-10-13 22:12:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Black box
ballendo@y...
2000-10-13 22:44:39 UTC
Re: Re: Re: Black box
Anne Ogborn
2000-10-14 00:56:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: Black box
ballendo@y...
2000-10-14 02:47:37 UTC
Re: Re: Re: Re: Black box
Art Fenerty
2000-10-14 05:03:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Black box
Art Fenerty
2000-10-14 05:09:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Black box
Art Fenerty
2000-10-14 05:25:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: Black box
Anne Ogborn
2000-10-14 13:18:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: Re: Black box
Anne Ogborn
2000-10-14 13:26:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Black box
Jon Elson
2000-10-14 23:13:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Black box
ron ginger
2000-12-10 08:07:49 UTC
Re: Black box
Mariss Freimanis
2000-12-10 09:16:02 UTC
Re: Black box
ron ginger
2000-12-10 14:47:32 UTC
Re: Black box
ballendo@y...
2000-12-10 15:09:10 UTC
re:Re: Black box
Mariss Freimanis
2000-12-10 16:01:32 UTC
re:Re: Black box
Carlos Guillermo
2000-12-10 16:29:07 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:Re: Black box
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2000-12-10 18:31:07 UTC
Re: Black box
ballendo@y...
2000-12-10 18:43:14 UTC
re:Re: Black box
Carlos Guillermo
2000-12-10 18:58:30 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:Re: Black box
Mariss Freimanis
2000-12-10 21:18:59 UTC
re:Re: Black box
Jon Elson
2000-12-10 23:24:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Black box
Carlos Guillermo
2000-12-11 06:14:21 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:Re: Black box