re:Re: Black box
Posted by
Mariss Freimanis
on 2000-12-10 16:01:32 UTC
Hi,
Things are moving very rapidly. I will have an axis card layout this
evening. There is no servoing involved. Rather the very crux of this
approach is the concept of integrating position from velocity. It
works, I have sold hundreds of units based on this concept.
This allows the PC to calculate a series of velocity commands that
are deterministic and can be output at leisure.
Using this approach, a circle would consist of 1,024 vectors a
second. If your circle had a circumfrence of 1" (0.159" radius) and
if you were to move at 1" per second, it would be a 1,024 sided
polygon. If the circumfrence were 10" and you were to be moving .1"
per second, then it would be a 102,400 sided polygon and so on.
Mariss
Things are moving very rapidly. I will have an axis card layout this
evening. There is no servoing involved. Rather the very crux of this
approach is the concept of integrating position from velocity. It
works, I have sold hundreds of units based on this concept.
This allows the PC to calculate a series of velocity commands that
are deterministic and can be output at leisure.
Using this approach, a circle would consist of 1,024 vectors a
second. If your circle had a circumfrence of 1" (0.159" radius) and
if you were to move at 1" per second, it would be a 1,024 sided
polygon. If the circumfrence were 10" and you were to be moving .1"
per second, then it would be a 102,400 sided polygon and so on.
Mariss
> I'm glad you asked this! I have also wondered if the 'dumb box'idea
> was really worth it! From Mariss' response, it appears weare 'servo-
> ing', whether it's a stepper or not. That is, current positionaxis
> is 'derived' rather than implicitly commanded. He didn't give a 2
> axis answer. I think that means the same calcs are done for each
> and all the bytes go out at the same time? Still haven't seen where...
> the direction bit(s) come in?
>
> And I'm still waiting for an answer to my earlier post asking if a
> circle will consist of 1024 'rate changes' per second?...
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Ballendo
Discussion Thread
Alvaro Fogassa
2000-10-13 00:08:30 UTC
Black box
Tom Caudle
2000-10-13 08:35:43 UTC
Re: Black box
Art Fenerty
2000-10-13 12:18:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Black box
Jon Elson
2000-10-13 16:33:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Black box
ballendo@y...
2000-10-13 18:29:16 UTC
Re: Re: Black box
Matt Shaver
2000-10-13 22:12:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Black box
ballendo@y...
2000-10-13 22:44:39 UTC
Re: Re: Re: Black box
Anne Ogborn
2000-10-14 00:56:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: Black box
ballendo@y...
2000-10-14 02:47:37 UTC
Re: Re: Re: Re: Black box
Art Fenerty
2000-10-14 05:03:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Black box
Art Fenerty
2000-10-14 05:09:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Black box
Art Fenerty
2000-10-14 05:25:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: Black box
Anne Ogborn
2000-10-14 13:18:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: Re: Black box
Anne Ogborn
2000-10-14 13:26:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Black box
Jon Elson
2000-10-14 23:13:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Black box
ron ginger
2000-12-10 08:07:49 UTC
Re: Black box
Mariss Freimanis
2000-12-10 09:16:02 UTC
Re: Black box
ron ginger
2000-12-10 14:47:32 UTC
Re: Black box
ballendo@y...
2000-12-10 15:09:10 UTC
re:Re: Black box
Mariss Freimanis
2000-12-10 16:01:32 UTC
re:Re: Black box
Carlos Guillermo
2000-12-10 16:29:07 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:Re: Black box
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2000-12-10 18:31:07 UTC
Re: Black box
ballendo@y...
2000-12-10 18:43:14 UTC
re:Re: Black box
Carlos Guillermo
2000-12-10 18:58:30 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:Re: Black box
Mariss Freimanis
2000-12-10 21:18:59 UTC
re:Re: Black box
Jon Elson
2000-12-10 23:24:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Black box
Carlos Guillermo
2000-12-11 06:14:21 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:Re: Black box