re: G201 Improvements
Posted by
ballendo@y...
on 2000-10-29 00:05:30 UTC
Mariss wrote:
This seems like a bad thing. Will we have to add a transistor to the
terminals so we can "short" this with our TTL Lo or HI ? I realise
you may have a "real estate" problem on the IO pins. But DISABLE is
pretty important, and probably best handled by you, with as little
required from us as possible?? (we can give you that HI or Lo)
Ballendo
P.S. I answered before I reviewed the owners manual for this drive.
>The DISABLE function will move to the current set input. ShortingMariss,
>the current set resistor will now disable the drive.
>Any comments or objections to this change will be appreciated.
This seems like a bad thing. Will we have to add a transistor to the
terminals so we can "short" this with our TTL Lo or HI ? I realise
you may have a "real estate" problem on the IO pins. But DISABLE is
pretty important, and probably best handled by you, with as little
required from us as possible?? (we can give you that HI or Lo)
Ballendo
P.S. I answered before I reviewed the owners manual for this drive.
Discussion Thread
Mariss Freimanis
2000-10-28 21:28:40 UTC
G201 Improvements
ballendo@y...
2000-10-29 00:05:30 UTC
re: G201 Improvements
ptengin@a...
2000-10-29 01:45:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201 Improvements
Wally K
2000-10-29 03:35:41 UTC
Re: G201 Improvements
Dan Mauch
2000-10-29 06:00:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201 Improvements
Tim Goldstein
2000-10-29 06:59:00 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201 Improvements
ballendo@y...
2000-10-29 13:11:45 UTC
Re: G201 Improvements
ptengin@a...
2000-10-29 13:18:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201 Improvements
Mariss Freimanis
2000-10-29 13:30:00 UTC
Re: G201 Improvements
ballendo@y...
2000-10-29 13:39:25 UTC
Re: G201 Improvements
Wally K
2000-10-29 14:03:09 UTC
Re: G201 Improvements
ballendo@y...
2000-10-29 14:36:07 UTC
Re: G201 Improvements
Dan Mauch
2000-10-29 15:00:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201 Improvements
Jon Elson
2000-10-29 22:15:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re: G201 Improvements