Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re: G201 Improvements
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2000-10-29 22:15:53 UTC
ballendo@... wrote:
the
amps will be disabled anytime the relay is not energized.
Jon
> Mariss wrote:You could use the normally closed contacts of a mechanical relay. Then,
> >The DISABLE function will move to the current set input. Shorting
> >the current set resistor will now disable the drive.
> >Any comments or objections to this change will be appreciated.
>
>
> Mariss,
>
> This seems like a bad thing. Will we have to add a transistor to the
> terminals so we can "short" this with our TTL Lo or HI ? I realise
> you may have a "real estate" problem on the IO pins. But DISABLE is
> pretty important, and probably best handled by you, with as little
> required from us as possible?? (we can give you that HI or Lo)
the
amps will be disabled anytime the relay is not energized.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Mariss Freimanis
2000-10-28 21:28:40 UTC
G201 Improvements
ballendo@y...
2000-10-29 00:05:30 UTC
re: G201 Improvements
ptengin@a...
2000-10-29 01:45:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201 Improvements
Wally K
2000-10-29 03:35:41 UTC
Re: G201 Improvements
Dan Mauch
2000-10-29 06:00:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201 Improvements
Tim Goldstein
2000-10-29 06:59:00 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201 Improvements
ballendo@y...
2000-10-29 13:11:45 UTC
Re: G201 Improvements
ptengin@a...
2000-10-29 13:18:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201 Improvements
Mariss Freimanis
2000-10-29 13:30:00 UTC
Re: G201 Improvements
ballendo@y...
2000-10-29 13:39:25 UTC
Re: G201 Improvements
Wally K
2000-10-29 14:03:09 UTC
Re: G201 Improvements
ballendo@y...
2000-10-29 14:36:07 UTC
Re: G201 Improvements
Dan Mauch
2000-10-29 15:00:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201 Improvements
Jon Elson
2000-10-29 22:15:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re: G201 Improvements