Re: Resolution and surface finish
Posted by
Fred Smith
on 2000-12-29 09:11:55 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com, Joe Vicars <jvicars@c...> wrote:
try 250 SFM without coolant. Take a finish cut(or two, depending on
your mill) after roughing out the pocket. Think in terms of .001-.002
depth of cut to hold close tolerances, .005-.010 for a nice
appearance. 4 flute is stiffer than two and has twice as many
cutting edges to spread out feed per tooth and hence can be fed at
twice the feed rate to get "about" the same surface
roughness/smoothness. Often in aluminum a conventional cutting
direction will result in a better finish as climb milling pulls the
chip back & it gets crimped between the tool & the work, making a
nasty finish. Use a little coolant(like tap magic for aluminum) for
dramatic improvement in appearance in aluminum.
Best,
Fred Smith
IMService
> Material 6061-T6This end mill will flex, may have to slow down the rpm for roughing,
> 1.5" flute length (sticking out of holder)
> Pocket Depth: .625"
> 1/2" endmill 2 flute, HSS, 2500rpm, 12ipm feed
> Climb cut, no coolant.
try 250 SFM without coolant. Take a finish cut(or two, depending on
your mill) after roughing out the pocket. Think in terms of .001-.002
depth of cut to hold close tolerances, .005-.010 for a nice
appearance. 4 flute is stiffer than two and has twice as many
cutting edges to spread out feed per tooth and hence can be fed at
twice the feed rate to get "about" the same surface
roughness/smoothness. Often in aluminum a conventional cutting
direction will result in a better finish as climb milling pulls the
chip back & it gets crimped between the tool & the work, making a
nasty finish. Use a little coolant(like tap magic for aluminum) for
dramatic improvement in appearance in aluminum.
Best,
Fred Smith
IMService
Discussion Thread
Joe Vicars
2000-12-29 05:36:18 UTC
Resolution and surface finish
Terry Toddy
2000-12-29 06:22:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolution and surface finish
Tim Goldstein
2000-12-29 06:36:16 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolution and surface finish
Joe Vicars
2000-12-29 08:28:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolution and surface finish
Fred Smith
2000-12-29 09:11:55 UTC
Re: Resolution and surface finish
Jon Elson
2000-12-29 12:12:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolution and surface finish
Jon Elson
2000-12-29 12:17:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Resolution and surface finish
Joe Vicars
2000-12-29 12:40:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolution and surface finish
Fred Smith
2000-12-29 14:26:07 UTC
Re: Re: Resolution and surface finish
ballendo@y...
2000-12-29 15:11:55 UTC
Re: Re: Resolution and surface finish
Jon Elson
2000-12-29 16:23:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolution and surface finish
Jon Elson
2000-12-29 16:38:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Resolution and surface finish
Marcus & Eva
2000-12-29 20:08:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolution and surface finish
ballendo@y...
2000-12-29 20:49:27 UTC
Re: Resolution and surface finish
Fred Smith
2000-12-29 21:39:28 UTC
Re: Resolution and surface finish
wanliker@a...
2000-12-30 11:07:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Resolution and surface finish
Carlos Guillermo
2000-12-30 15:15:02 UTC
machine accuracy (was Resolution and surface finish)
Smoke
2000-12-30 15:44:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine accuracy (was Resolution and surface finish)