Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolution and surface finish
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2000-12-29 16:23:32 UTC
Joe Vicars wrote:
'clean up' the bottom cutting edge by hand with a bench stone. This seems to keep
the cutters running longer between real resharpenings.
import stuff runs around $8 for a 1/4" and maybe $6-8 for a 1/2". This
makes it far more affordable, and the results are really a lot better.
I have pretty much stopped buying plain HSS, and converted almost
completely to M-42 and similar cobalt tooling for general work, and
use the carbide some for tricky situations. The carbide keeps its
edge for a LONG time, and the difference between M-42 and HSS
is at least 2:1 longer life.
Jon
> Jon,I think you will find a substantial improvement when you do this.
> I keep the chips out with air. Sometimes I use Kerosene, but mostly for drilling. Flooding is not possible with my machine. I
> have a "mist" cooling deal (leur?) but haven't installed it yet.
> The pocket I refered to was done 7 passes at .100" each leaving .020" on the walls. One finish pass at full depth climb cutting
> to take the remaining.
> I'm going to reprogram and cut another one this weekend. I'm going to leave only .005" and finish with a new 4 flute.
>I have found out it is easier to resharpen end mills than I once thought. I now often
> I also find that when profiling I use the uppermost of the flute possible because the bottom of most endmills is worn first.
'clean up' the bottom cutting edge by hand with a bench stone. This seems to keep
the cutters running longer between real resharpenings.
> OfYes, US made, name brand carbide is WAY expensive. But, some of the
> course in a blind pocket sometimes this is not possible. I'm not in a position to run out and buy new cutters all the time. I love
> carbide but can rarely justify the cost.
import stuff runs around $8 for a 1/4" and maybe $6-8 for a 1/2". This
makes it far more affordable, and the results are really a lot better.
I have pretty much stopped buying plain HSS, and converted almost
completely to M-42 and similar cobalt tooling for general work, and
use the carbide some for tricky situations. The carbide keeps its
edge for a LONG time, and the difference between M-42 and HSS
is at least 2:1 longer life.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Joe Vicars
2000-12-29 05:36:18 UTC
Resolution and surface finish
Terry Toddy
2000-12-29 06:22:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolution and surface finish
Tim Goldstein
2000-12-29 06:36:16 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolution and surface finish
Joe Vicars
2000-12-29 08:28:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolution and surface finish
Fred Smith
2000-12-29 09:11:55 UTC
Re: Resolution and surface finish
Jon Elson
2000-12-29 12:12:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolution and surface finish
Jon Elson
2000-12-29 12:17:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Resolution and surface finish
Joe Vicars
2000-12-29 12:40:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolution and surface finish
Fred Smith
2000-12-29 14:26:07 UTC
Re: Re: Resolution and surface finish
ballendo@y...
2000-12-29 15:11:55 UTC
Re: Re: Resolution and surface finish
Jon Elson
2000-12-29 16:23:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolution and surface finish
Jon Elson
2000-12-29 16:38:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Resolution and surface finish
Marcus & Eva
2000-12-29 20:08:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolution and surface finish
ballendo@y...
2000-12-29 20:49:27 UTC
Re: Resolution and surface finish
Fred Smith
2000-12-29 21:39:28 UTC
Re: Resolution and surface finish
wanliker@a...
2000-12-30 11:07:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Resolution and surface finish
Carlos Guillermo
2000-12-30 15:15:02 UTC
machine accuracy (was Resolution and surface finish)
Smoke
2000-12-30 15:44:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine accuracy (was Resolution and surface finish)