CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Resolution and surface finish

Posted by Jon Elson
on 2000-12-29 12:17:48 UTC
Fred Smith wrote:

> Often in aluminum a conventional cutting
> direction will result in a better finish as climb milling pulls the
> chip back & it gets crimped between the tool & the work, making a
> nasty finish.

Are you sure about this? I always climb mill for best finish.
My experience is that conventional milling is the direction that
causes recutting of chips and bad surface finish. The technical
books also confirm this with drawings showing why that is so.

In conventional milling, the cutting edge comes around and skates
across the already finished surface before developing enough
pressure to dig into the material, leaving the chip that was riding on
the cutting edge welded to the already finished surface.

With climb milling, the cutting edge comes around and plunges
hard into the UNCUT surface, biting in immediately, and even if
the attached chip does stick to the surface, that is the UNCUT
material it is stuck to. The finished surface is left clean.

Jon

Discussion Thread

Joe Vicars 2000-12-29 05:36:18 UTC Resolution and surface finish Terry Toddy 2000-12-29 06:22:36 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolution and surface finish Tim Goldstein 2000-12-29 06:36:16 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolution and surface finish Joe Vicars 2000-12-29 08:28:34 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolution and surface finish Fred Smith 2000-12-29 09:11:55 UTC Re: Resolution and surface finish Jon Elson 2000-12-29 12:12:29 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolution and surface finish Jon Elson 2000-12-29 12:17:48 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Resolution and surface finish Joe Vicars 2000-12-29 12:40:14 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolution and surface finish Fred Smith 2000-12-29 14:26:07 UTC Re: Re: Resolution and surface finish ballendo@y... 2000-12-29 15:11:55 UTC Re: Re: Resolution and surface finish Jon Elson 2000-12-29 16:23:32 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolution and surface finish Jon Elson 2000-12-29 16:38:47 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Resolution and surface finish Marcus & Eva 2000-12-29 20:08:59 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolution and surface finish ballendo@y... 2000-12-29 20:49:27 UTC Re: Resolution and surface finish Fred Smith 2000-12-29 21:39:28 UTC Re: Resolution and surface finish wanliker@a... 2000-12-30 11:07:20 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Resolution and surface finish Carlos Guillermo 2000-12-30 15:15:02 UTC machine accuracy (was Resolution and surface finish) Smoke 2000-12-30 15:44:53 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine accuracy (was Resolution and surface finish)