CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: Re: Resolution and surface finish

Posted by Fred Smith
on 2000-12-29 14:26:07 UTC
>Message: 21
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 14:24:01 -0600
> From: Jon Elson <jmelson@...>
>Subject: Re: Re: Resolution and surface finish
>
>
>
>Fred Smith wrote:
>
>> Often in aluminum a conventional cutting
>> direction will result in a better finish as climb milling pulls the
>> chip back & it gets crimped between the tool & the work, making a
>> nasty finish.
>
>Are you sure about this? I always climb mill for best finish.
>My experience is that conventional milling is the direction that
>causes recutting of chips and bad surface finish. The technical
>books also confirm this with drawings showing why that is so.

Well if I wasn't sure do you think I would have posted it? Maybe you're not doing it right if you "always" do it the same way. What you say is usually, though not always, true in steel. It is even less often true in aluminum. Maybe the best way would be to try it and see if it improved the cut.


Best Regards, Fred Smith- IMService
Listserve Special discounts and offers are at: http://209.69.202.197/cadcamedmdro.html

imserv@... Voice:248-486-3600 or 800-386-1670 Fax: 248-486-3698

Discussion Thread

Joe Vicars 2000-12-29 05:36:18 UTC Resolution and surface finish Terry Toddy 2000-12-29 06:22:36 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolution and surface finish Tim Goldstein 2000-12-29 06:36:16 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolution and surface finish Joe Vicars 2000-12-29 08:28:34 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolution and surface finish Fred Smith 2000-12-29 09:11:55 UTC Re: Resolution and surface finish Jon Elson 2000-12-29 12:12:29 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolution and surface finish Jon Elson 2000-12-29 12:17:48 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Resolution and surface finish Joe Vicars 2000-12-29 12:40:14 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolution and surface finish Fred Smith 2000-12-29 14:26:07 UTC Re: Re: Resolution and surface finish ballendo@y... 2000-12-29 15:11:55 UTC Re: Re: Resolution and surface finish Jon Elson 2000-12-29 16:23:32 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolution and surface finish Jon Elson 2000-12-29 16:38:47 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Resolution and surface finish Marcus & Eva 2000-12-29 20:08:59 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolution and surface finish ballendo@y... 2000-12-29 20:49:27 UTC Re: Resolution and surface finish Fred Smith 2000-12-29 21:39:28 UTC Re: Resolution and surface finish wanliker@a... 2000-12-30 11:07:20 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Resolution and surface finish Carlos Guillermo 2000-12-30 15:15:02 UTC machine accuracy (was Resolution and surface finish) Smoke 2000-12-30 15:44:53 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine accuracy (was Resolution and surface finish)