Re: Resolution and surface finish
Posted by
Fred Smith
on 2000-12-29 21:39:28 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com, Jon Elson <jmelson@a...> wrote:
least a STRONG antibacklash nut on a lead screw.
DO NOT CLIMB MILL ON ANY MILL THAT HAS A LEAD SCREW!!!
is a good general safety practice for all roughing.
For finishing, taking very light passes can be done with climb milling,
but may also result in significant gouging and a scrap part.
Generally speaking with a rigid machine the horsepower, whether
electrical or actual ponies is about 1/3 when climb milling, for
roughing. For finishing it is nil, so check out both directions. You will
be amazed that in some situations climb milling is NOT the best
cuttting direction for finishing. I speak with the experience and
memory of having done it LAST week.
Best Regards,
Fred Smith
IMService
>It may also depend on flush coolant and having a ball screw or at
> Anyway, with my machine (Bridgeport), my tools and my materials
> (6061, 2024 mostly), I absolutely, without any question, find that climb
> milling gives excellent finish, and conventional milling gives a LOT of
> welded on chips, and anywhere from a rough finish to something
> resembling a wood rasp! This depends on the material, feed rate and
> cooling, of course.
least a STRONG antibacklash nut on a lead screw.
DO NOT CLIMB MILL ON ANY MILL THAT HAS A LEAD SCREW!!!
is a good general safety practice for all roughing.
For finishing, taking very light passes can be done with climb milling,
but may also result in significant gouging and a scrap part.
Generally speaking with a rigid machine the horsepower, whether
electrical or actual ponies is about 1/3 when climb milling, for
roughing. For finishing it is nil, so check out both directions. You will
be amazed that in some situations climb milling is NOT the best
cuttting direction for finishing. I speak with the experience and
memory of having done it LAST week.
Best Regards,
Fred Smith
IMService
Discussion Thread
Joe Vicars
2000-12-29 05:36:18 UTC
Resolution and surface finish
Terry Toddy
2000-12-29 06:22:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolution and surface finish
Tim Goldstein
2000-12-29 06:36:16 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolution and surface finish
Joe Vicars
2000-12-29 08:28:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolution and surface finish
Fred Smith
2000-12-29 09:11:55 UTC
Re: Resolution and surface finish
Jon Elson
2000-12-29 12:12:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolution and surface finish
Jon Elson
2000-12-29 12:17:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Resolution and surface finish
Joe Vicars
2000-12-29 12:40:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolution and surface finish
Fred Smith
2000-12-29 14:26:07 UTC
Re: Re: Resolution and surface finish
ballendo@y...
2000-12-29 15:11:55 UTC
Re: Re: Resolution and surface finish
Jon Elson
2000-12-29 16:23:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolution and surface finish
Jon Elson
2000-12-29 16:38:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Resolution and surface finish
Marcus & Eva
2000-12-29 20:08:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Resolution and surface finish
ballendo@y...
2000-12-29 20:49:27 UTC
Re: Resolution and surface finish
Fred Smith
2000-12-29 21:39:28 UTC
Re: Resolution and surface finish
wanliker@a...
2000-12-30 11:07:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Resolution and surface finish
Carlos Guillermo
2000-12-30 15:15:02 UTC
machine accuracy (was Resolution and surface finish)
Smoke
2000-12-30 15:44:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] machine accuracy (was Resolution and surface finish)