CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Linux Loaded on 486...what now

Posted by Patrick Huss
on 1999-07-28 17:31:14 UTC
In looking over the packages I need to add to equal the workstation install,
I've decided the best option would be to just go back and do a workststion
install. The question I have is this - all of the MANY instructions I've
read on LINUX installation recommend partitioning the disk something like
/100M , /usr 200M , /usr/src200M , etc.; what then is the drawback(s) of
using the very basic filestructure created by Workstation install? Also,
when you do partition the disk and do a custom install, how does linux
distribute the installation? In other words, do the various packages and
components get placed on their respective partitions automatically? Do you
have to relocate them later?
Patrick

Discussion Thread

Patrick Huss 1999-07-28 08:57:05 UTC Linux Loaded on 486...what now Tim Goldstein 1999-07-28 09:31:42 UTC Re: Linux Loaded on 486...what now Patrick Huss 1999-07-28 10:56:52 UTC Re: Linux Loaded on 486...what now Patrick Huss 1999-07-28 17:31:14 UTC Linux Loaded on 486...what now Tim Goldstein 1999-07-28 19:51:44 UTC RE: Linux Loaded on 486...what now Bob Bachman 1999-07-28 23:25:00 UTC Re: Linux Loaded on 486...what now Dan Mauch 1999-07-29 06:39:12 UTC Re: Linux Loaded on 486...what now Tim Goldstein 1999-07-29 08:09:34 UTC Re: Linux Loaded on 486...what now Fred Proctor 1999-07-29 08:35:05 UTC Re: Linux Loaded on 486...what now Fred Proctor 1999-07-29 08:43:20 UTC Re: Linux Loaded on 486...what now Patrick Huss 1999-07-29 08:53:04 UTC Re: Linux Loaded on 486...what now Fred Proctor 1999-07-29 10:20:39 UTC Re: Linux Loaded on 486...what now Marshall Pharoah 1999-07-29 10:43:51 UTC Re: Linux Loaded on 486...what now Jon Elson 1999-07-29 11:56:06 UTC Re: Linux Loaded on 486...what now Jon Elson 1999-07-29 12:04:25 UTC Re: Linux Loaded on 486...what now Jon Elson 1999-07-29 21:37:43 UTC Re: Linux Loaded on 486...what now