Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: YAK (digitizer YAK at that)

Please do not take the digitizer thread to a private list yet. I for one am
watching this thread closely. A friend of mine and I have just had to
purchase a $1200 probe for a project I am working on, and I did not like
spending that kind of money.

Tom Eldredge, Trustee

----- Original Message -----
From: Jon Anderson <janders@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2001 12:10 PM
Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: YAK (digitizer YAK at that)


> Carlos Guillermo wrote:
>
> > but my offer still stands to make drawings for it if
> > anyone is interested in actually *taking action* on this subject,
>
> I'm interested in making one. The file you posted was very clear. I
> could probably make one without a drawing, but drawings would allow
> everyone interested to make one. It's the electronics that snow me.
> Would like to see a simple debounce circuit that outputs a TTL
> compatible signal. My preference would be for this to be external to the
> probe head, allowing maximum flexibility for fabrication.
>
> Carlos, we can always take this to private email for further
> development.
>
> Jon
>
> Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the
discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.
>
> Addresses:
> Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@egroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@egroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@egroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... [Moderator]
> URL to this page: http://www.egroups.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> bill,
> List Manager
>
>