Re: YAK (digitizer YAK at that)
Posted by
Roman Black
on 2001-01-15 07:53:00 UTC
> > but my offer still stands to make drawings for it ifDebounce circuit is easy, a 555 timer chip
> > anyone is interested in actually *taking action* on this subject,
>
> I'm interested in making one. The file you posted was very clear. I
> could probably make one without a drawing, but drawings would allow
> everyone interested to make one. It's the electronics that snow me.
> Would like to see a simple debounce circuit that outputs a TTL
> compatible signal.
(under 50c) and a couple of other parts will
give a monostable with adjustble delay period.
The very first "trigger" bounce will pull
the output low, which will then stay low
for a set time.
-Roman
Discussion Thread
Jon Anderson
2001-01-14 10:11:36 UTC
Re: YAK (digitizer YAK at that)
Tom Eldredge
2001-01-15 06:49:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: YAK (digitizer YAK at that)
Roman Black
2001-01-15 07:53:00 UTC
Re: YAK (digitizer YAK at that)
Jon Anderson
2001-01-15 10:32:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: YAK (digitizer YAK at that)
Jon Anderson
2001-01-15 10:35:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: YAK (digitizer YAK at that)
Lee Studley
2001-01-15 10:58:48 UTC
Re: YAK (digitizer YAK at that)
Jon Anderson
2001-01-15 12:12:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: YAK (digitizer YAK at that)
Carlos Guillermo
2001-01-15 18:35:27 UTC
digitizer design and FAB
PMeinhard@a...
2001-01-16 03:58:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] digitizer design and FAB
Roman Black
2001-01-16 04:46:01 UTC
Re: YAK (digitizer YAK at that)
Jon Anderson
2001-01-16 08:01:50 UTC
[CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: YAK (digitizer YAK at that)
Carlos Guillermo
2001-01-16 10:00:45 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] digitizer design and FAB
PhilC
2001-01-16 10:28:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] digitizer design and FAB
Sven Peter, TAD S.A.
2001-01-16 11:35:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] digitizer design and FAB