CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] not stiff enough!

Posted by Smoke
on 2001-01-20 11:50:07 UTC
.132 deflection? What material is that shaft made from, what is the shaft
geometry? I can suspend a four foot bar on 2 "knife" edges, place 25 # in
the middle and wouldn't get that much deflection.

Smoke

-----Original Message-----
From: Les Watts <leswatts@...>
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com>
Date: Saturday, January 20, 2001 7:41 AM
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] not stiff enough!


>It was mentioned before that you need some better end support on your
>machine. I ran some quick numbers on my
>beam deflection software for you to see what that would do.
>The dimensions are not exactly the same ( I forgot them)
>but are close enough to put things in perspective.
>
>For a .75" diameter shaft 4 feet long simply supported at the ends with a
25
>lb force at the midpoint I got .132" deflection.
>Over an eighth of an inch!
>
>Simple support is like a see saw fulcrum or a single small clamp on the end
>of the shaft.
>
>
>For the same conditions with FIXED supports on the end I got
>.03" deflection- four times less!
>
>Fixed support would be something like an end clamp making
>contact over at least a couple inches with the shaft rigidly fixed
>to a stronger support. It resists bending moments.
>
>Hope this helps.
>
>Leslie Watts
>L M Watts Furniture
>Tiger, Georgia USA
>http://www.rabun.net/~leswatts/wattsfurniturewp.html
>
>
>Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the
discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.
>
>Addresses:
>Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com
>Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@egroups.com
>Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@egroups.com, wanliker@...
>Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
>URL to this page: http://www.egroups.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>bill,
>List Manager
>
>FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
>
>

Discussion Thread

Richard Spelling 2001-01-19 07:52:25 UTC not stiff enough! Joe Vicars 2001-01-19 09:48:54 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] not stiff enough! John D. Guenther 2001-01-19 09:50:39 UTC Re: not stiff enough! richard@s... 2001-01-19 12:13:42 UTC Re: not stiff enough! richard@s... 2001-01-19 12:28:42 UTC Re: not stiff enough! Smoke 2001-01-19 12:31:32 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: not stiff enough! Joe Vicars 2001-01-19 12:32:18 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: not stiff enough! richard@s... 2001-01-19 12:45:53 UTC Re: not stiff enough! ballendo@y... 2001-01-19 15:03:42 UTC Re: not stiff enough! ballendo@y... 2001-01-19 15:23:02 UTC re:Re: not stiff enough! ballendo@y... 2001-01-19 15:26:54 UTC re:Re: Re: not stiff enough! Terry Ackland 2001-01-19 17:06:48 UTC re:Re: Re: not stiff enough! Les Watts 2001-01-20 05:48:47 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] not stiff enough! Smoke 2001-01-20 11:50:07 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] not stiff enough! Les Watts 2001-01-20 14:44:28 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] not stiff enough! Smoke 2001-01-20 15:20:55 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] not stiff enough! Richard Spelling 2001-01-22 07:00:24 UTC Re: not stiff enough! Steve Greenfield 2001-01-22 08:41:48 UTC Re: not stiff enough!