Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Servomotor w/Enc. Part II
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2001-01-24 22:26:26 UTC
Tom Csibor wrote:
with TTL outputs and 5 V supply voltage would be the best fit. You want
a reasonable resolution, somewhere between 2000 counts/inch as an
absolute minimum, and 20000 counts/inch max. If you have too high
a resolution encoder, the CPU will be overloaded cranking out step
pulses, and even a small following error will overrun the 128 count
maximum following error on the Gecko, and it will fault.
Jon
> Along the same lines as this thread, I have just recently purchased 3Any digital encoder, either linear or shaft, should work. Especially, those
> of the same 320 Gecko drives to retrofit my mill. The current
> encoders (really resolvers) need to be updated. Can anyone give me
> some advice as to the type of encoder and possible sources that would
> work well with the 320 drives?
with TTL outputs and 5 V supply voltage would be the best fit. You want
a reasonable resolution, somewhere between 2000 counts/inch as an
absolute minimum, and 20000 counts/inch max. If you have too high
a resolution encoder, the CPU will be overloaded cranking out step
pulses, and even a small following error will overrun the 128 count
maximum following error on the Gecko, and it will fault.
Jon
Discussion Thread
NCS
2001-01-24 08:36:48 UTC
Servomotor w/Enc. Part II
Jon Elson
2001-01-24 12:13:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Servomotor w/Enc. Part II
Tom Csibor
2001-01-24 16:34:21 UTC
Re: Servomotor w/Enc. Part II
Tim Goldstein
2001-01-24 16:51:05 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Servomotor w/Enc. Part II
Tom Csibor
2001-01-24 17:41:33 UTC
Re: Servomotor w/Enc. Part II
Jon Elson
2001-01-24 22:26:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Servomotor w/Enc. Part II
Dan Mauch
2001-01-25 07:20:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Servomotor w/Enc. Part II