CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] O/T Patent applications

Posted by Jon Elson
on 2001-01-25 15:17:17 UTC
Dan Mauch wrote:

> I once heard that patents were for lawyers. Hmmm.
> What is really interesting is to go to a hardware store, pick up a light
> bulb and see how many patents cover it. Then pick up a competitors light
> bulb and see how many different patents cover it.

In almost all cases, where we're talking incandescent bulbs, there are
NO patents on the bulb itself. There may be patents that are sort of inherent
in the bulb, but are really patents on the processes used to manufacture
the bulb, as in the sealing, wire attachment, socket attachment, etc.
The patent that appears to refer to the bulb may be really a patent on the
package that protects the bulb for shipping, or the process of stuffing the
bulb into the package automatically, without breaking bulbs.

The incandescent bulb has been around so long that there is not likely
to be much chance of important innovation in the basic bulb.
Of course, there are Halogen lamps, etc. and other special purpose
lamps, but the basic bulb hasn't changed much in the last 50 years.

Jon

Discussion Thread

Hans Vogel 2001-01-24 02:37:52 UTC O/T Patent applications Les Watts 2001-01-24 05:44:13 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] O/T Patent applications Sven Peter, TAD S.A. 2001-01-24 17:41:51 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] O/T Patent applications Jon Elson 2001-01-24 22:54:48 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] O/T Patent applications ballendo@y... 2001-01-25 05:14:29 UTC Re: O/T Patent applications ballendo@y... 2001-01-25 06:42:32 UTC Re: O/T Patent applications Dan Mauch 2001-01-25 06:56:31 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] O/T Patent applications Greg Nuspel 2001-01-25 07:18:44 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] O/T Patent applications Joe Vicars 2001-01-25 07:29:11 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] O/T Patent applications Les Watts 2001-01-25 09:27:57 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] O/T Patent applications Smoke 2001-01-25 10:52:34 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: O/T Patent applications Smoke 2001-01-25 10:56:17 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] O/T Patent applications Smoke 2001-01-25 10:59:48 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] O/T Patent applications Gail & Bryan Harries 2001-01-25 11:42:31 UTC Re: O/T Patent applications Jon Anderson 2001-01-25 12:05:02 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] O/T Patent applications Smoke 2001-01-25 12:16:28 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: O/T Patent applications Steve Baldwin 2001-01-25 14:26:03 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] O/T Patent applications richard@s... 2001-01-25 14:41:38 UTC Re: O/T Patent applications Les Watts 2001-01-25 15:03:04 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] O/T Patent applications Jon Elson 2001-01-25 15:17:17 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] O/T Patent applications Greg Nuspel 2001-01-25 16:31:24 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] O/T Patent applications ballendo@y... 2001-01-25 17:17:08 UTC re:Re: O/T Patent applications Smoke 2001-01-25 18:35:58 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] O/T Patent applications ballendo@y... 2001-01-25 19:22:30 UTC re:Re: O/T Patent applications JanRwl@A... 2001-01-25 21:05:19 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: O/T Patent applications Tony Jeffree 2001-01-25 22:47:06 UTC Re: O/T Patent applications Smoke 2001-01-25 23:51:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: O/T Patent applications