Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Metal selection 101
Posted by
dave engvall
on 2001-03-14 09:09:50 UTC
Smoke wrote:
microcracking. Indeed this method has been used successfully for years but in today's enviroument with too many attorneys I think
better methods (as below) are more defensible. i.e.
Carburize, cool. reheat and quench or do the double reheat mentioned in my previous post.
According to : "Met Trans", Vol 4, p 1195-1200.
per previous post:
low number of stress cycles high number of stress cycles
1. 200 ksi 155 ksi quench from 1550
2. 250 180 cool, reheat, quench from 1550
3. 325 260 cool, reheat, quench from 1550, reheat quench
from1450.
I doubt whether carburizing in charcoal/calcium phosphate or gas carburizing makes much difference.
I hope this makes it a bit clearer than my orginal post.
Dave
> I think the best method for hardening the 8620 is color case hardening.Not quite true. Color case hardening quenches into water directly from the carburizing mixture and is guaranteed to lead to
> the process is simple, leave a nice looking HARD surface and a soft inner
> core.
microcracking. Indeed this method has been used successfully for years but in today's enviroument with too many attorneys I think
better methods (as below) are more defensible. i.e.
Carburize, cool. reheat and quench or do the double reheat mentioned in my previous post.
According to : "Met Trans", Vol 4, p 1195-1200.
per previous post:
low number of stress cycles high number of stress cycles
1. 200 ksi 155 ksi quench from 1550
2. 250 180 cool, reheat, quench from 1550
3. 325 260 cool, reheat, quench from 1550, reheat quench
from1450.
> treatment #3 had about half the retained austenite of treatments 1 & 2. This is where the dry ice treatment has a chance toBTW - surface hardness was somewhere between Rc 60 and 65 for all three treatments.
> really do some good in driving down retained austenite. :-)
I doubt whether carburizing in charcoal/calcium phosphate or gas carburizing makes much difference.
I hope this makes it a bit clearer than my orginal post.
Dave
>
> This is ideal for firearms receivers as the soft core helps prevent
> shattering of the receiver(in your face) if an overloaded cartridge happens
> to be fired in it.
>
> Smoke
Discussion Thread
dave engvall
2001-03-12 16:48:56 UTC
Re: Metal selection 101
dave engvall
2001-03-12 22:19:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Metal selection 101
Smoke
2001-03-12 22:46:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Metal selection 101
Sven Peter, TAD S.A.
2001-03-13 19:16:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Metal selection 101
Jon Anderson
2001-03-14 07:39:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Metal selection 101
dave engvall
2001-03-14 08:46:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Metal selection 101
dave engvall
2001-03-14 09:09:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Metal selection 101
Smoke
2001-03-14 15:25:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Metal selection 101
dave engvall
2001-03-14 15:36:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Metal selection 101
Smoke
2001-03-14 15:41:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Metal selection 101
wanliker@a...
2001-03-14 21:59:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Metal selection 101
Smoke
2001-03-15 11:57:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Metal selection 101