Re: Flat as a (very precise) pancake...
Posted by
hexagon@o...
on 2001-03-27 23:19:12 UTC
---hi,
there is a product out there that has been used successfully for
years
, it is called 'shim'. Perhaps a little old fashioned and low tech
for
the group but it does have its merits.
T.
In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "Kevin P. Martin" <kpmartin@t...> wrote:
impossible
thermal
linear
the flat
there is a product out there that has been used successfully for
years
, it is called 'shim'. Perhaps a little old fashioned and low tech
for
the group but it does have its merits.
T.
In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "Kevin P. Martin" <kpmartin@t...> wrote:
> >-----Original Message-----Handbook to see
> >From: Tom Murray [mailto:thomasm923@a...]
> >Is there a way to calculate the proper length to thickness ratio to
> >give me my desired "flatness"?
>
> Well, you can use the beam deflection formulae in Machinery's
> how much the thing will sag under its own weight. It would bealmost
impossible
> to finish a surface to a finer precision than the amount ofself-induced sag.
>irregular
> On the other hand distortion caused by further aging or by
thermal
> expansion is probably impossible to predict.floppy
>
> This all leads me to the next question, though:
> You want these "really flat" pieces for mounting a relatively
linear
> guide rail. The overall assembly will, of course, be about as stiffas the flat
> piece itself.frame, or
> But what holds up the flat piece? I assume it will be attached to a
> directly to legs, etc. How can you do this attachment withoutdistorting the
> flat piece?operation of
> Also, how much flexing will occur under the forces imparted by the
> the finished unit (acceleration plus cutting forces, if any)? Aslong as these
> forces are small compared to the weight of the flat piece, thedeflections they
> impart will be small compared to the sag that limits the flatnessof
the flat
> piece. OTOH if these forces are much greater than the weight of theflat piece,
> its no-load flatness will be largely irrelevant.
> -Kevin Martin
Discussion Thread
Tom Murray
2001-03-26 20:43:56 UTC
Flat as a (very precise) pancake...
Jon Elson
2001-03-26 22:23:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flat as a (very precise) pancake...
Ian Wright
2001-03-27 00:47:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flat as a (very precise) pancake...
Tom Murray
2001-03-27 07:50:03 UTC
Re: Flat as a (very precise) pancake...
Marcus & Eva
2001-03-27 08:23:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flat as a (very precise) pancake...
Bob Campbell
2001-03-27 08:48:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flat as a (very precise) pancake...
Tom Murray
2001-03-27 09:12:05 UTC
Re: Flat as a (very precise) pancake...
Marcus
2001-03-27 09:24:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flat as a (very precise) pancake...
Tom Murray
2001-03-27 10:37:54 UTC
Re: Flat as a (very precise) pancake...
Kevin P. Martin
2001-03-27 11:38:47 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flat as a (very precise) pancake...
Ian Wright
2001-03-27 12:21:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flat as a (very precise) pancake...
mycomminc@a...
2001-03-27 17:51:29 UTC
Re: Flat as a (very precise) pancake...
hexagon@o...
2001-03-27 23:19:12 UTC
Re: Flat as a (very precise) pancake...
diazden
2001-03-28 19:58:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flat as a (very precise) pancake...
Ian Wright
2001-03-29 00:49:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flat as a (very precise) pancake...
Jon Anderson
2001-03-29 07:16:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flat as a (very precise) pancake...
Ian Wright
2001-03-29 11:25:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flat as a (very precise) pancake...
Jon Anderson
2001-03-29 11:41:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flat as a (very precise) pancake...
diazden
2001-03-29 17:06:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flat as a (very precise) pancake...