CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flat as a (very precise) pancake...

Posted by Marcus
on 2001-03-27 09:24:20 UTC
Hi Tom:
It is the length to thickness ratio that determines the magnitude of the
problem.
A 1/4" thick block 2" long is easy to grind flat within 0.0002"
A 12" bar of the same thickness can be an impossible nightmare to get flat
within 0.005"
Similarly, a 2" thick bar 60" long will be a real challenge to get flat and
to keep flat.
This is why you want a deep section for any support pad for a linear way.
It will have sufficient stiffness to pull the linear rail straight.(linear
rails ain't straight right out of the box either!!)

Cheers

Marcus
----- Original Message -----
From: Tom Murray <thomasm923@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 9:11 AM
Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flat as a (very precise) pancake...


> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "Marcus & Eva" <implmex@a...> wrote:
> > Hi Tom:
> > The problem is that skinny stuff won't stay flat even when it's
> > precision ground.
> > Getting it flat and getting it to stay flat is really hard to do.
> > Precision ground stock is usually parallel within 0.0005" but
> that's about
> > all.
> > Cheers
> >
> > Marcus
>
> What is considered the "skinny stuff"? I was thinking about using
> 3/8" to 5/8" stock. Would the above problem still apply?
>
> Tom Murray
>
>
> Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the
discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.
>
> Addresses:
> Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
> URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> bill,
> List Manager
>
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

Discussion Thread

Tom Murray 2001-03-26 20:43:56 UTC Flat as a (very precise) pancake... Jon Elson 2001-03-26 22:23:26 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flat as a (very precise) pancake... Ian Wright 2001-03-27 00:47:08 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flat as a (very precise) pancake... Tom Murray 2001-03-27 07:50:03 UTC Re: Flat as a (very precise) pancake... Marcus & Eva 2001-03-27 08:23:49 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flat as a (very precise) pancake... Bob Campbell 2001-03-27 08:48:29 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flat as a (very precise) pancake... Tom Murray 2001-03-27 09:12:05 UTC Re: Flat as a (very precise) pancake... Marcus 2001-03-27 09:24:20 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flat as a (very precise) pancake... Tom Murray 2001-03-27 10:37:54 UTC Re: Flat as a (very precise) pancake... Kevin P. Martin 2001-03-27 11:38:47 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flat as a (very precise) pancake... Ian Wright 2001-03-27 12:21:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flat as a (very precise) pancake... mycomminc@a... 2001-03-27 17:51:29 UTC Re: Flat as a (very precise) pancake... hexagon@o... 2001-03-27 23:19:12 UTC Re: Flat as a (very precise) pancake... diazden 2001-03-28 19:58:42 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flat as a (very precise) pancake... Ian Wright 2001-03-29 00:49:38 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flat as a (very precise) pancake... Jon Anderson 2001-03-29 07:16:00 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flat as a (very precise) pancake... Ian Wright 2001-03-29 11:25:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flat as a (very precise) pancake... Jon Anderson 2001-03-29 11:41:23 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flat as a (very precise) pancake... diazden 2001-03-29 17:06:38 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flat as a (very precise) pancake...