RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Not-so-off-topic: rectifiers
Posted by
Carol & Jerry Jankura
on 2001-07-13 05:28:34 UTC
Dual secondary, or tapped secondary? There's a difference. If it's truly two
secondaries that run through their own diodes, I'd be more apt to think that
they had the transformers left over from something else (or purchased them
at a surplus house). Given a choice between a center tapped and bridge
circuit, I'd prefer the center tapped design. Basically, it has fewer parts
(even if you use a packaged bridge, it's two diodes vs four. I'd also put a
small inductor between the diode cathodes and the filter capacitor to limit
the inrush current and protect the diodes.
| -----Original Message-----
| From: alenz@... [mailto:alenz@...]
| Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 10:09 PM
| To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
| Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Not-so-off-topic: rectifiers
|
|
| --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., Randy Gordon-Gilmore <zephyrus@r...>
| wrote:
| >............
| > I did notice that on the too-enthusiastic linear supply I had, they
| used a
| > dual secondary and a single diode on each one, instead of a single
| > secondary and a bridge. I'm assuming that beefy single diodes are
| easier
| > to come by than beefy bridges...
|
| Randy,
| I've wondered the same thing, but it might be the cost of the
| transformer rather than the diodes. The center tapped transformer
| used in the two diode rectifier has to have double the voltage
| but only half the current rating of the one used in the bridge
| rectifier. I know that as the current rating goes up, so does the
| size and weight. Not sure what the economic trade-offs are.
| I had a 24 V 10 amp that I used. It and a small 12 v supply just
| barely squeeze into an old PC power supply case. Works fine, but it
| takes both hands to pick it up! That is the downside of too much
| overkill.
| al
|
|
| Addresses:
| FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
| FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
|
| Post messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
| Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
| Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
| List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
| Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
| URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
| bill,
| List Manager
|
|
|
| Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
|
|
secondaries that run through their own diodes, I'd be more apt to think that
they had the transformers left over from something else (or purchased them
at a surplus house). Given a choice between a center tapped and bridge
circuit, I'd prefer the center tapped design. Basically, it has fewer parts
(even if you use a packaged bridge, it's two diodes vs four. I'd also put a
small inductor between the diode cathodes and the filter capacitor to limit
the inrush current and protect the diodes.
| -----Original Message-----
| From: alenz@... [mailto:alenz@...]
| Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 10:09 PM
| To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
| Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Not-so-off-topic: rectifiers
|
|
| --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., Randy Gordon-Gilmore <zephyrus@r...>
| wrote:
| >............
| > I did notice that on the too-enthusiastic linear supply I had, they
| used a
| > dual secondary and a single diode on each one, instead of a single
| > secondary and a bridge. I'm assuming that beefy single diodes are
| easier
| > to come by than beefy bridges...
|
| Randy,
| I've wondered the same thing, but it might be the cost of the
| transformer rather than the diodes. The center tapped transformer
| used in the two diode rectifier has to have double the voltage
| but only half the current rating of the one used in the bridge
| rectifier. I know that as the current rating goes up, so does the
| size and weight. Not sure what the economic trade-offs are.
| I had a 24 V 10 amp that I used. It and a small 12 v supply just
| barely squeeze into an old PC power supply case. Works fine, but it
| takes both hands to pick it up! That is the downside of too much
| overkill.
| al
|
|
| Addresses:
| FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
| FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
|
| Post messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
| Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
| Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
| List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
| Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
| URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
| bill,
| List Manager
|
|
|
| Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
|
|
Discussion Thread
info.host@b...
2001-07-09 19:19:43 UTC
Off topic, inverters / rectifiers
Jon Elson
2001-07-09 19:58:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Off topic, inverters / rectifiers
Doug Harrison
2001-07-09 20:12:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Off topic, inverters / rectifiers
Doug Harrison
2001-07-09 20:19:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Off topic, inverters / rectifiers
info.host@b...
2001-07-09 22:46:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Off topic, inverters / rectifiers
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2001-07-09 23:03:16 UTC
Not-so-off-topic: rectifiers
Jon Elson
2001-07-09 23:27:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Off topic, inverters / rectifiers
Jon Elson
2001-07-09 23:37:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Not-so-off-topic: rectifiers
Intellicorp001
2001-07-10 01:30:34 UTC
Re: Off topic, inverters / rectifiers
info.host@b...
2001-07-10 01:36:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Off topic, inverters / rectifiers
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2001-07-10 05:20:55 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Not-so-off-topic: rectifiers
Tim Goldstein
2001-07-10 06:57:20 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Off topic, inverters / rectifiers
brian
2001-07-10 17:28:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Not-so-off-topic: rectifiers
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2001-07-12 17:00:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Not-so-off-topic: rectifiers
JanRwl@A...
2001-07-12 19:00:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Not-so-off-topic: rectifiers
alenz@c...
2001-07-12 19:09:24 UTC
Re: Not-so-off-topic: rectifiers
Jon Elson
2001-07-12 20:26:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Not-so-off-topic: rectifiers
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2001-07-12 21:22:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Not-so-off-topic: rectifiers
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2001-07-12 21:27:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Not-so-off-topic: rectifiers
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2001-07-13 05:28:34 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Not-so-off-topic: rectifiers
Garry & Maxine Foster
2001-07-15 06:05:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Off topic, inverters / rectifiers
info.host@b...
2001-07-15 10:47:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Off topic, inverters / rectifiers