Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Posted by
Alan Marconett KM6VV
on 2001-08-31 13:53:19 UTC
Hi Chris,
Yeah, I have to agree!
John has posted new files, all DXF/CCD's work fine now! Now that I
think of it, if the DXF's were skewed like the CCD I tried, that would
probably be why programs didn't like them, but they "looked" complete.
ZIP's ARE a more secure way of exchanging files.
Alan KM6VV
P.S. Another thanks to John!
Chris Luebke wrote:
Yeah, I have to agree!
John has posted new files, all DXF/CCD's work fine now! Now that I
think of it, if the DXF's were skewed like the CCD I tried, that would
probably be why programs didn't like them, but they "looked" complete.
ZIP's ARE a more secure way of exchanging files.
Alan KM6VV
P.S. Another thanks to John!
Chris Luebke wrote:
>
> Alan Marconett KM6VV wrote:
>
> (snippy snip snip)
>
> I would like to
>
> > understand the file exchange problems!
>
> I dont think that it will ever be possible to figure out DXF file transfers. I
> have found that there are always bumps in the road with the format. Always will
> be. I have even exported a DXF file from various proggies that couldn't even
> import their own rendition of the same file !
>
> I do know that some browsers and e-mail proggies will display a DXF file right
> "inline" with any other part of the message, causing something to go awry with
> the format of a DXF file. I had the same with Vector and a different file from
> a friend. He Zipped it, it Worked.
>
> If it is Zipped up first, it ends up like a legit attachment. Unzip it, save it
> and import or merge it, THEN it works.......... Well, as well as DXF files work
> anyhow !
>
> I will say that so far Vector has done a very good job sorting out dupes and
> such. The Reorganize command is excellent !
>
> Too bad there will probably NEVER be a format one can rely on. Too many "new"
> methods, too many copyright issues, too many lawyers and too much "cad
> politics". We keep spending money, but we will always lose..............
>
> Chris L
Discussion Thread
machines@n...
2001-08-30 15:11:00 UTC
Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-08-30 16:09:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
machines@n...
2001-08-30 16:33:59 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-08-30 18:52:26 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Chris L
2001-08-30 19:27:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Chris L
2001-08-30 19:30:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-08-30 20:43:47 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
machines@n...
2001-08-31 00:53:59 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
machines@n...
2001-08-31 00:59:19 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Carlos Guillermo
2001-08-31 05:26:03 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Fred Smith
2001-08-31 05:39:41 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
machines@n...
2001-08-31 09:47:17 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-08-31 10:16:07 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-08-31 11:33:31 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Chris Luebke
2001-08-31 12:23:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
machines@n...
2001-08-31 12:26:51 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-08-31 13:46:31 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-08-31 13:53:19 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Fred Smith
2001-08-31 14:23:38 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
wanliker@a...
2001-08-31 15:07:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
wanliker@a...
2001-08-31 15:07:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Peter Harrison
2001-09-01 16:26:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Jon Elson
2001-09-01 17:35:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Peter Harrison
2001-09-02 05:26:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
IMService
2001-09-02 06:19:28 UTC
Re:Re: Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Art Fenerty
2001-09-02 06:44:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Re: Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Tony Jeffree
2001-09-02 09:46:37 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Fred Smith
2001-09-02 09:50:32 UTC
Re:Re: Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
cncdxf@a...
2001-09-02 10:56:38 UTC
Re:Re: Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
machines@n...
2001-09-02 11:31:28 UTC
Re:Re: Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
cncdxf@a...
2001-09-02 13:26:21 UTC
Re:Re: Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Art Fenerty
2001-09-02 13:46:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Re: Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
wanliker@a...
2001-09-02 14:09:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Re: Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
wanliker@a...
2001-09-02 14:13:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Re: Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Gail & Bryan Harries
2001-09-02 14:41:43 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Re: Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Art Fenerty
2001-09-02 14:49:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
rab@r...
2001-09-02 15:00:12 UTC
Re:Re: Re: Optimizing cutting paths