Re:Re: Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Posted by
IMService
on 2001-09-02 06:19:28 UTC
>Message: 25Oh please, Mr. Experience tell me why you forgot to mention the 90% reduction in bandwidth?
> Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2001 00:25:46 +0100
> From: Peter Harrison <egroups@...>
>Subject: Re: Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
>
>
>Oh please...
>
>Just about all the original Internet protocols are based around text
>transfers. So reliable is the transfer of text (as long as it is seven
>bit ASCII) that email attachments are converted to text for
>transmission. If there is a problem, it is potentially in the
>transmission of eight bit ASCII and binary files that are treated as
>eight bit ASCII.
Of course who cares if an attached joke list gets a few corrupted characters, it's just Text, or even a few JPG's of Gif's, just some speckles in the picture. How about if it is a file for the Concorde or the Space Shuttle, or any other "life" situation? I receive between 5-10 dxf files a day , and have received several hundred very large IGES files over the last few years. I know what causes and prevents corrupted files. It has been especially bad with files received from Germany for some reason. Partially because of the volume and I suspect because of other "communications" reasons. Never have any problems with zips. period.
My instructions were not to save twice. They were to save without displaying in the browser. A DXF file, being text, will open up in a browser window, saving this displayed file will change the formatting of the DXF file (to a bastardized form of HTML) and in some cases make it useless. Removing the extra garbage lines added by the browser, when it saves the text file, fixes the problem.
Best Regards, Fred Smith- IMService
Listserve Special discounts and offers are at: http://209.69.202.197/cced.html
imserv@... Voice:248-486-3600 or 800-386-1670 Fax: 248-486-3698
Discussion Thread
machines@n...
2001-08-30 15:11:00 UTC
Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-08-30 16:09:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
machines@n...
2001-08-30 16:33:59 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-08-30 18:52:26 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Chris L
2001-08-30 19:27:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Chris L
2001-08-30 19:30:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-08-30 20:43:47 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
machines@n...
2001-08-31 00:53:59 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
machines@n...
2001-08-31 00:59:19 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Carlos Guillermo
2001-08-31 05:26:03 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Fred Smith
2001-08-31 05:39:41 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
machines@n...
2001-08-31 09:47:17 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-08-31 10:16:07 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-08-31 11:33:31 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Chris Luebke
2001-08-31 12:23:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
machines@n...
2001-08-31 12:26:51 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-08-31 13:46:31 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-08-31 13:53:19 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Fred Smith
2001-08-31 14:23:38 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
wanliker@a...
2001-08-31 15:07:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
wanliker@a...
2001-08-31 15:07:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Peter Harrison
2001-09-01 16:26:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Jon Elson
2001-09-01 17:35:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Peter Harrison
2001-09-02 05:26:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
IMService
2001-09-02 06:19:28 UTC
Re:Re: Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Art Fenerty
2001-09-02 06:44:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Re: Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Tony Jeffree
2001-09-02 09:46:37 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Fred Smith
2001-09-02 09:50:32 UTC
Re:Re: Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
cncdxf@a...
2001-09-02 10:56:38 UTC
Re:Re: Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
machines@n...
2001-09-02 11:31:28 UTC
Re:Re: Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
cncdxf@a...
2001-09-02 13:26:21 UTC
Re:Re: Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Art Fenerty
2001-09-02 13:46:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Re: Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
wanliker@a...
2001-09-02 14:09:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Re: Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
wanliker@a...
2001-09-02 14:13:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Re: Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Gail & Bryan Harries
2001-09-02 14:41:43 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Re: Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Art Fenerty
2001-09-02 14:49:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
rab@r...
2001-09-02 15:00:12 UTC
Re:Re: Re: Optimizing cutting paths