Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2001-09-01 17:35:37 UTC
Peter Harrison wrote:
correct delivery to an absolute degree. They do guarantee that all
data that passes the CRC tests will be accurate to one part in 65,536
because the checksum is only 16-bits. Actually, the error could be
even more likely, if the error had a particular pattern to it related to
the simple way the checksum is calculated. But, it seems pretty reliable,
anyway.
Jon
> >I probably shouldn't pick this nit, but the protocols do not guarantee
> >When transferring files over the internet, it is important to
> >understand that ascii files are subject to lightning strikes,
> >wiretaps, any kind of static might affect the transmission of the
> >data around the world. Therefore if you try to use an ascii format
> >to define a drawing it might have a problem.
> >
>
> Oh please...
>
> Just about all the original Internet protocols are based around text
> transfers. So reliable is the transfer of text (as long as it is seven
> bit ASCII) that email attachments are converted to text for
> transmission. If there is a problem, it is potentially in the
> transmission of eight bit ASCII and binary files that are treated as
> eight bit ASCII.
>
> Data, in general, transmitted via the Internet is remarkably stable. The
> protocols used are error detecting and error correcting. I don't recall
> a provable error in data transmitted from end to end. Sure there may
> have been all manner of mess in the middle but the Internet protocols
> guarantee correct delivery (although they don't actually guarantee
> delivery itself).
correct delivery to an absolute degree. They do guarantee that all
data that passes the CRC tests will be accurate to one part in 65,536
because the checksum is only 16-bits. Actually, the error could be
even more likely, if the error had a particular pattern to it related to
the simple way the checksum is calculated. But, it seems pretty reliable,
anyway.
>Yes, quite true!
> You are much more likely to suffer data corruption on your own PC when
> just copying files from folder to folder. There is no error checking
> involved by default.
Jon
Discussion Thread
machines@n...
2001-08-30 15:11:00 UTC
Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-08-30 16:09:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
machines@n...
2001-08-30 16:33:59 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-08-30 18:52:26 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Chris L
2001-08-30 19:27:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Chris L
2001-08-30 19:30:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-08-30 20:43:47 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
machines@n...
2001-08-31 00:53:59 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
machines@n...
2001-08-31 00:59:19 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Carlos Guillermo
2001-08-31 05:26:03 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Fred Smith
2001-08-31 05:39:41 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
machines@n...
2001-08-31 09:47:17 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-08-31 10:16:07 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-08-31 11:33:31 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Chris Luebke
2001-08-31 12:23:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
machines@n...
2001-08-31 12:26:51 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-08-31 13:46:31 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-08-31 13:53:19 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Fred Smith
2001-08-31 14:23:38 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
wanliker@a...
2001-08-31 15:07:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
wanliker@a...
2001-08-31 15:07:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Peter Harrison
2001-09-01 16:26:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Jon Elson
2001-09-01 17:35:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Peter Harrison
2001-09-02 05:26:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
IMService
2001-09-02 06:19:28 UTC
Re:Re: Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Art Fenerty
2001-09-02 06:44:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Re: Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Tony Jeffree
2001-09-02 09:46:37 UTC
Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Fred Smith
2001-09-02 09:50:32 UTC
Re:Re: Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
cncdxf@a...
2001-09-02 10:56:38 UTC
Re:Re: Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
machines@n...
2001-09-02 11:31:28 UTC
Re:Re: Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
cncdxf@a...
2001-09-02 13:26:21 UTC
Re:Re: Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Art Fenerty
2001-09-02 13:46:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Re: Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
wanliker@a...
2001-09-02 14:09:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Re: Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
wanliker@a...
2001-09-02 14:13:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Re: Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Gail & Bryan Harries
2001-09-02 14:41:43 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Re: Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
Art Fenerty
2001-09-02 14:49:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Optimizing cutting paths - The proof
rab@r...
2001-09-02 15:00:12 UTC
Re:Re: Re: Optimizing cutting paths