re: mill/drill questions
Posted by
ballendo
on 2002-02-18 01:20:28 UTC
Doc,
We discuss all these issues regularly on the yahoo mill drill group.
Hope this helps.
Ballendo
We discuss all these issues regularly on the yahoo mill drill group.
Hope this helps.
Ballendo
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "docholliday01201" <whollid1@m...> wrote:
> A general machining question if you don't mind.
>
>
>
> Over the last three years I have completely worn out the
> sherline milling machine. Over the last one year I have developed
> the CNC conversion to its fullest degree on this machine. However
> over three years of use the X axis ways are completely destroyed.
As
> well the machine is quite small for what I wish to do. So I find
> myself browsing for a new machine.
>
> Two general options come to mind: one would be a full-size
> used Bridgeport milling machine, or Bridgeport clone. Which I
would
> slowly convert to servo based CNC controls, likely using gecko
> drivers,EMC , and servo motors purchased from Ebay. The other
> options is one of the Chinese benchtop milling machine's. What I
do
> not understand is the functional difference between a gear head
> machine, versus a belt driven machine. For equivalent hp ratings
> there appears to be about $300 difference between equally equipped
> machines. I understand the gear head allows for more rapid
spindles
> speed changes but I do not understand the claims of more stable
> spindle speeds. I could see if there was gross belt slippage this
> would be an issue. But I do not understand in general usage how
> driving the spindle by means of gears produces any more efficient
> drive than the use of a belt. I understand from engineering that
the
> gear drive is more efficient than a belt, but very slightly so . I
> could see if this were to be a CNC application where the motor was
to
> have an encoder. But a very slight wavering of the spindle speed
> should have no functional difference in machining.
>
> Any thoughts anyone has, especially comments from individuals
> who have used both machines would be appreciated
>
> The likely application of this machine would be making something
> along the lines of go cart parts, radio control car parts or the
like.
Discussion Thread
docholliday01201
2002-02-17 13:52:26 UTC
dave_ace_me
2002-02-17 17:11:07 UTC
Bridgeport (was : no subject)
John H.
2002-02-17 17:42:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport (was : no subject)
ballendo
2002-02-18 01:20:28 UTC
re: mill/drill questions
stevenson_engineers
2002-02-18 05:26:14 UTC
Re: Bridgeport (was : no subject)
dave_ace_me
2002-02-18 05:34:38 UTC
Re: Bridgeport (was : no subject)
stevenson_engineers
2002-02-18 08:21:54 UTC
Re: Bridgeport (was : no subject)
audiomaker2000
2002-02-18 09:09:53 UTC
Re: Bridgeport (was : no subject)