RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] BASIC, yes! was Re: TypeMatic Rate
Posted by
Carol & Jerry Jankura
on 2002-02-22 05:53:27 UTC
One thing to consider when using BASIC, or any other language for that
matter - Choose a compiler rather than an interpreter.
What's the difference? A compiler reads the human readable code one time,
converts it into code that the computer understands and produces an
executable program. An interpreter is the program (not the CNC program
written in BASIC). It runs while you're running the machine and reads each
line, one line at a time and figures out (interprets) what it's supposed to
do. Which means that, on the same machine, an interpreter will execute your
program much slower than the same program which is compiled once and
executed.
While BASIC seems to have the greatest number of interpreters, other
languages such as UCSD pascal are also interpreters of sorts.
-- Carol & Jerry Jankura
Strongsville, Ohio
So many toys, so little time....
P.S. Ballendo - I'm aware of Stepster being written in Basic. What are the
other three programs?
|-----Original Message-----
|From: ballendo [mailto:ballendo@...]
|Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 4:00 AM
|To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
|Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] BASIC, yes! was Re: TypeMatic Rate
|
|
|Barry,
|
|BASIC's not so bad. (you don't need line numbers anymore)
|
|I know of at least FOUR popular cnc controllers written using BASIC.
|Successfully controlling several hundreds of machines!
matter - Choose a compiler rather than an interpreter.
What's the difference? A compiler reads the human readable code one time,
converts it into code that the computer understands and produces an
executable program. An interpreter is the program (not the CNC program
written in BASIC). It runs while you're running the machine and reads each
line, one line at a time and figures out (interprets) what it's supposed to
do. Which means that, on the same machine, an interpreter will execute your
program much slower than the same program which is compiled once and
executed.
While BASIC seems to have the greatest number of interpreters, other
languages such as UCSD pascal are also interpreters of sorts.
-- Carol & Jerry Jankura
Strongsville, Ohio
So many toys, so little time....
P.S. Ballendo - I'm aware of Stepster being written in Basic. What are the
other three programs?
|-----Original Message-----
|From: ballendo [mailto:ballendo@...]
|Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 4:00 AM
|To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
|Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] BASIC, yes! was Re: TypeMatic Rate
|
|
|Barry,
|
|BASIC's not so bad. (you don't need line numbers anymore)
|
|I know of at least FOUR popular cnc controllers written using BASIC.
|Successfully controlling several hundreds of machines!
Discussion Thread
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2002-02-20 05:34:04 UTC
TypeMatic Rate
fast1994gto
2002-02-20 06:48:06 UTC
Re: TypeMatic Rate
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-02-20 11:27:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] TypeMatic Rate
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-02-20 13:58:24 UTC
Re: TypeMatic Rate
fast1994gto
2002-02-20 17:34:33 UTC
Re: TypeMatic Rate
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-02-20 18:32:28 UTC
Re: TypeMatic Rate
fast1994gto
2002-02-21 00:03:47 UTC
Re: TypeMatic Rate
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-02-21 11:40:02 UTC
Re: TypeMatic Rate
Bert Pirson
2002-02-21 12:09:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: TypeMatic Rate
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2002-02-21 13:50:56 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: TypeMatic Rate
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-02-21 13:57:01 UTC
Re: TypeMatic Rate
ballendo
2002-02-22 04:00:00 UTC
BASIC, yes! was Re: TypeMatic Rate
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2002-02-22 05:53:27 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] BASIC, yes! was Re: TypeMatic Rate
JanRwl@A...
2002-02-22 23:17:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] BASIC, yes! was Re: TypeMatic Rate
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2002-02-23 05:37:03 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] BASIC, yes! was Re: TypeMatic Rate
ballendo
2002-02-23 06:10:50 UTC
BASIC, yes! was Re: TypeMatic Rate