Re: CNC Part Setup
Posted by
rainnea
on 2002-03-07 10:28:39 UTC
I'll sometimes use a similar procedure, especially for cutting uneven
or miss-shaped materials or when I want to fit a design to a block of
material with minimum waste.
Instead of writing down position coordinates, I just press a button
on a custom script within 3DS Max that calls Master5's ocx interface,
it reads the current position data and creates a reference point
straight in the drawing. I can then create a simple 3D model of the
material using these points if neccesary.
I can then scale and position the part and send the data back to
Master5 for cutting.
Works quite well,
Rab
or miss-shaped materials or when I want to fit a design to a block of
material with minimum waste.
Instead of writing down position coordinates, I just press a button
on a custom script within 3DS Max that calls Master5's ocx interface,
it reads the current position data and creates a reference point
straight in the drawing. I can then create a simple 3D model of the
material using these points if neccesary.
I can then scale and position the part and send the data back to
Master5 for cutting.
Works quite well,
Rab
>This is
> Greetings,
> Your head is swimming and you are wondering how to set up parts.
> just the beginning! I taught CNC machining and injection moldmanufacturing
> for five years at a university and I have had the good fortune towork with
> awsome toolmakers from all over the world. What I've found is thatthere
> are a lot of ways to set up a part for milling. Some always set up(zero)
> on the lower left corner so all numbers are positive. Othersindicate in on
> the middle of the part. Some on the middle, closest edge to you.the vise
>
> Here's what I do on critical things and why. I throw my part on
> crooked. Intentionally it is mounted so it looks like I walked by,tossed
> it down, and bolted or clamped it to the table where it landed. Ithen
> verify the top is flat (parallel) table. From there I use awiggler (A
> spinning shaft with a spring) and touch off on two locations oneach of the
> four vertical edges (assuming a square or rectangular part). Eachtime I
> touch off I write these numbers down using the machine absolutecoordinate
> system. When finished "wiggling off" I have 8 points which I plotin
> CAD/CAM, as mentioned using the absolute coordinate system from themill.
> In CAD I make a square using these 8 points by connecting each setof
> points. Of course you have to extend the lines once connected.Once I have
> an outline of the raw part in CAD, I take the PART model in cadand move
> and rotate it to make it match the outline of the box I just drew(DON'T
> MOVE THE REFERENCE BOX!!!). Typically I keep the part model and themanipulation
> reference square-(frozen) on two different layers to make
> easier.numbers in
>
> I then generate my G-Code using a cam package. Cool thing is the
> the CAD/CAM modelyour G54
> match the absolute numbers on the mill. No worry about loosing
> (home) position.up. But in
>
> This method is by far the most time intensive method for setting
> the five years I used it, I didn't screw up any parts because ofbeing
> located in the wrong position or from being .002" or so off in thewrong
> direction. Reason being by indicating on all four sides you arehalving (at
> a minimum) the error from only wiggling on two edges. Plus if youmake a
> typo keying in your numbers it shows up in CAD as the referencesquare you
> draw comes out goofy looking.only that
>
> Authors note: I didn't say there were no screw ups in five years,
> I was not indicated or homed wrong. There was still plenty ofscrap, this
> was just one less worry. :-)no "influence"
>
> The advantages to this system are big. Less mistakes and
> from you with regards toindicate a
> "thinking" the part is "close enough". By this I mean when you
> part in as parallel with an x or y axis, at some point you say okthat small
> amount of error is acceptable. The way I mentioned circumventsthis.
>on the
> Disadvantages: Slower, more work, and you can not use the handles
> mill in manual mode to make a slot in the x or y axis as your partis
> sitting crooked (unless you want a slot running at an angle acrossyour part
> :-)it to be
>
> I didn't always use the above described method, only when I needed
> right and really accurate the first time. - which is frequently thecase
> with injection molds (or home made gun parts :-)
>
> Hope that helps
> Rob Anderson
> Mechanical Engineer Tritronics
> (And really curious guy in general)
Discussion Thread
Rob Anderson
2002-03-07 07:51:34 UTC
CNC Part Setup
Marcus & Eva
2002-03-07 08:58:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNC Part Setup
rainnea
2002-03-07 10:28:39 UTC
Re: CNC Part Setup
Sven Peter
2002-03-07 12:31:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNC Part Setup
doug98105
2002-03-07 14:06:45 UTC
Re: CNC Part Setup
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-03-07 16:06:48 UTC
Re: CNC Part Setup
Smoke
2002-03-07 16:51:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNC Part Setup
doug98105
2002-03-07 22:16:18 UTC
Re: CNC Part Setup
Scot Rogers
2002-03-07 23:35:13 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNC Part Setup
Andrew Werby
2002-03-08 13:34:31 UTC
CNC Part Setup