Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Capacitors
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2002-03-18 09:00:37 UTC
n4onl wrote:
using obsolete terminology. They really should conform to the standard.
Jon
> > > How come some capacitors are measured in uF units and some are mfdAfter sending my reply, I realized that a number of manufacturers are
> > > units?
> >
> > You must have an old junkbox! mfd is an obsolete designation that
> was
> > phased out at the end of WW II. Europeans use all the metric
> ranges,
> > so they have uF, nF and pF. You will find old stuff that has uuF
> instead
> > of pF, too.
> >
> > Jon
>
> Not necessarily, I have a MallorY (the 'allor' are smaller caps with
> a line over them, Trademark?) computer grade capacitor TYPE CGS rated
> at 32000 MFD (microfarad) 30VDC right here that is about 15 years
> old, and at work we have some computer grade MallorY's rated at 15000
> MFD 100VDC that are less than 5 years old. Some manufacturers just
> like to stick to the old ways of marking capicitors, and Mallory
> seems to like all capitol letters. I've been interested in
> electronics for over 35 years (and have both amateur radio and
> commercial FCC licenses for over 25 of thoes) and uF, mF, MF, MFD...
> have always been interchangeable, at least here in the US.
using obsolete terminology. They really should conform to the standard.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Gene
2002-03-17 09:01:50 UTC
Capacitors
donbrock00
2002-03-17 09:27:52 UTC
Re: Capacitors
captnorm3@j...
2002-03-17 09:58:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Capacitors
Stan Stocker
2002-03-17 20:32:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Capacitors
Jon Elson
2002-03-17 22:05:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Capacitors
n4onl
2002-03-17 23:30:07 UTC
Re: Capacitors
Jon Elson
2002-03-18 09:00:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Capacitors
Bill Vance
2002-03-18 14:58:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Capacitors
Brian
2002-03-18 18:05:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Capacitors