Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cap question
Posted by
JanRwl@A...
on 2002-04-01 21:35:15 UTC
In a message dated 01-Apr-02 21:55:50 Central Standard Time,
pbweber@... writes:
WATTAGE to accept the over-voltage, and the current through it that would
result therefrom. This can cause WORSE "explosions", not to mention damage
to the power-supply bridge-rectifier, or VR, if used.
One way to "protect" the zener is to insert a low-R (0.1 ohm, etc.) of how
many, fifty watts?, in series with the zener. And, use a 50 W zener. Ever
price those???
This is simply one of those "good ideas on paper which are not practical".
Best engineering is to design with a CAP rated for the "worst case" voltage!
It doesn't have to be "close", just "over"! MUCH cheaper alternative to
"engineering a fix for an imagined, not-yet-experienced problem!!!!! Jan
Rowland
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
pbweber@... writes:
> I'm thinking a zener diode to ground rated a littlePaul: This first must assume the zener you'd USE for that has a sufficient
> above the rated voltage of the cap?
WATTAGE to accept the over-voltage, and the current through it that would
result therefrom. This can cause WORSE "explosions", not to mention damage
to the power-supply bridge-rectifier, or VR, if used.
One way to "protect" the zener is to insert a low-R (0.1 ohm, etc.) of how
many, fifty watts?, in series with the zener. And, use a 50 W zener. Ever
price those???
This is simply one of those "good ideas on paper which are not practical".
Best engineering is to design with a CAP rated for the "worst case" voltage!
It doesn't have to be "close", just "over"! MUCH cheaper alternative to
"engineering a fix for an imagined, not-yet-experienced problem!!!!! Jan
Rowland
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
Mike Snodgrass
2002-04-01 14:34:59 UTC
cap question
Scott M. Thomas
2002-04-01 14:53:55 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] cap question
RC
2002-04-01 15:00:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] cap question
lenskeeper2000
2002-04-01 15:27:20 UTC
Re: cap question
Tim Goldstein
2002-04-01 15:41:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cap question
Mike Snodgrass
2002-04-01 16:47:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cap question
n4onl
2002-04-01 17:42:04 UTC
Re: cap question
Paul Weber
2002-04-01 19:50:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cap question
JanRwl@A...
2002-04-01 20:41:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] cap question
JanRwl@A...
2002-04-01 21:35:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cap question
Bill Vance
2002-04-01 22:51:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cap question
Jon Elson
2002-04-01 22:56:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] cap question
JanRwl@A...
2002-04-01 23:01:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cap question
Jon Elson
2002-04-01 23:01:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] cap question
Jon Elson
2002-04-01 23:17:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cap question
cadcamcenter
2002-04-02 00:12:07 UTC
Re: cap question
cadcamcenter
2002-04-02 00:19:02 UTC
Re: cap question
Mike Snodgrass
2002-04-02 07:00:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] cap question
Jon Elson
2002-04-02 10:53:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cap question
Jon Elson
2002-04-02 11:05:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] cap question
Sven Peter
2002-04-02 16:31:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cap question
ballendo
2002-04-13 03:55:20 UTC
Re: cap question