Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] cap question
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2002-04-01 22:56:06 UTC
Mike Snodgrass wrote:
but not overkill. Especially when we had a short power failure, the system
kept running right through it.
25,000 uF is an absolute MINIMUM value! This sets the ripple to a reasonable
value, assuming there are no slight dips in the power, clipped half-cycles, or
whatever. Unless you run it from an on-line UPS, you won't have power like
that. You need a LOT more uF if there is more than 8.3 mS between charging
pulses - like 1 second!
Let's see, 25 A will cause 33,000 uF to fall 758 Volts per second, so you have
a droop of .758 Volts per mS. In 8.3 mS (the time between charging pulses
at 120 Hz) you have a droop of 6.29 V. BUT, if you want to ride out line
disturbances, you need more energy storage capacity. (Of course, will this
power supply REALLY be delivering 25 A all the time? I really doubt it.)
Multiplying by 10 wouldn't hurt, but you certainly won't have a problem by
using 33,000 uF instead of 25,000.
Jon
> Hello, on my on-going power supply project, I am puttingI think I have 250,000 uF on my 10 A 69 V power supply. I think it is adequate,
> together a 25A unit. By using a rough estimate of 1000mf
> per A load, I need 25000mf. I have a 33000mf 60V cap. The output of my trans is 58V. Is there anyway to "trim"
> 8000mf? How much overfiltering can be tolerated?
but not overkill. Especially when we had a short power failure, the system
kept running right through it.
25,000 uF is an absolute MINIMUM value! This sets the ripple to a reasonable
value, assuming there are no slight dips in the power, clipped half-cycles, or
whatever. Unless you run it from an on-line UPS, you won't have power like
that. You need a LOT more uF if there is more than 8.3 mS between charging
pulses - like 1 second!
Let's see, 25 A will cause 33,000 uF to fall 758 Volts per second, so you have
a droop of .758 Volts per mS. In 8.3 mS (the time between charging pulses
at 120 Hz) you have a droop of 6.29 V. BUT, if you want to ride out line
disturbances, you need more energy storage capacity. (Of course, will this
power supply REALLY be delivering 25 A all the time? I really doubt it.)
Multiplying by 10 wouldn't hurt, but you certainly won't have a problem by
using 33,000 uF instead of 25,000.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Mike Snodgrass
2002-04-01 14:34:59 UTC
cap question
Scott M. Thomas
2002-04-01 14:53:55 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] cap question
RC
2002-04-01 15:00:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] cap question
lenskeeper2000
2002-04-01 15:27:20 UTC
Re: cap question
Tim Goldstein
2002-04-01 15:41:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cap question
Mike Snodgrass
2002-04-01 16:47:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cap question
n4onl
2002-04-01 17:42:04 UTC
Re: cap question
Paul Weber
2002-04-01 19:50:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cap question
JanRwl@A...
2002-04-01 20:41:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] cap question
JanRwl@A...
2002-04-01 21:35:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cap question
Bill Vance
2002-04-01 22:51:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cap question
Jon Elson
2002-04-01 22:56:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] cap question
JanRwl@A...
2002-04-01 23:01:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cap question
Jon Elson
2002-04-01 23:01:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] cap question
Jon Elson
2002-04-01 23:17:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cap question
cadcamcenter
2002-04-02 00:12:07 UTC
Re: cap question
cadcamcenter
2002-04-02 00:19:02 UTC
Re: cap question
Mike Snodgrass
2002-04-02 07:00:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] cap question
Jon Elson
2002-04-02 10:53:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cap question
Jon Elson
2002-04-02 11:05:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] cap question
Sven Peter
2002-04-02 16:31:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cap question
ballendo
2002-04-13 03:55:20 UTC
Re: cap question