Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cap question
Posted by
Bill Vance
on 2002-04-01 22:51:47 UTC
On Mon Apr 1 21:35:05 2002, JanRwl@..., <JanRwl@...> wrote:
used to regulate voltage, is to put a potentiometer between it and ground. Now
if at that zener/pot juncture, you connect the base of an NPN transistor with
the emitter going to ground, and the collector connected above the zener, the
transistor would drop the voltage everytime the zener reached it's limit. An
extra pot might be needed between the juncture and the transistor base, in order
to adjust the transistor properly, but you could get away with using a
lightweight zener that way.
Bill
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
RKBA! ***** Blessings On Thee, Oh Israel! ***** 4-19!
----------------+----------+--------------------------+---------------------
An _EFFECTIVE_ | Insured | All matter is vibration. | Let he who hath no
weapon in every | by COLT; | -- Max Plank | weapon sell his
hand = Freedom | DIAL | In the beginning was the | garment and buy a
on every side! | 1911-A1. | word. -- The Bible | sword.--Jesus Christ
----------------+----------+--------------------------+---------------------
Constitutional Government is dead, LONG LIVE THE CONSTITUTION!!!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>In a message dated 01-Apr-02 21:55:50 Central Standard Time,Couldn't you use a transistor to drop it? Consider: One of the ways zeners are
>pbweber@... writes:
>
>
>> I'm thinking a zener diode to ground rated a little
>> above the rated voltage of the cap?
>
>
>Paul: This first must assume the zener you'd USE for that has a sufficient
>WATTAGE to accept the over-voltage, and the current through it that would
>result therefrom. This can cause WORSE "explosions", not to mention damage
>to the power-supply bridge-rectifier, or VR, if used.
>
>One way to "protect" the zener is to insert a low-R (0.1 ohm, etc.) of how
>many, fifty watts?, in series with the zener. And, use a 50 W zener. Ever
>price those???
>
>This is simply one of those "good ideas on paper which are not practical".
>Best engineering is to design with a CAP rated for the "worst case" voltage!
>It doesn't have to be "close", just "over"! MUCH cheaper alternative to
>"engineering a fix for an imagined, not-yet-experienced problem!!!!! Jan
>Rowland
used to regulate voltage, is to put a potentiometer between it and ground. Now
if at that zener/pot juncture, you connect the base of an NPN transistor with
the emitter going to ground, and the collector connected above the zener, the
transistor would drop the voltage everytime the zener reached it's limit. An
extra pot might be needed between the juncture and the transistor base, in order
to adjust the transistor properly, but you could get away with using a
lightweight zener that way.
Bill
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
RKBA! ***** Blessings On Thee, Oh Israel! ***** 4-19!
----------------+----------+--------------------------+---------------------
An _EFFECTIVE_ | Insured | All matter is vibration. | Let he who hath no
weapon in every | by COLT; | -- Max Plank | weapon sell his
hand = Freedom | DIAL | In the beginning was the | garment and buy a
on every side! | 1911-A1. | word. -- The Bible | sword.--Jesus Christ
----------------+----------+--------------------------+---------------------
Constitutional Government is dead, LONG LIVE THE CONSTITUTION!!!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discussion Thread
Mike Snodgrass
2002-04-01 14:34:59 UTC
cap question
Scott M. Thomas
2002-04-01 14:53:55 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] cap question
RC
2002-04-01 15:00:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] cap question
lenskeeper2000
2002-04-01 15:27:20 UTC
Re: cap question
Tim Goldstein
2002-04-01 15:41:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cap question
Mike Snodgrass
2002-04-01 16:47:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cap question
n4onl
2002-04-01 17:42:04 UTC
Re: cap question
Paul Weber
2002-04-01 19:50:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cap question
JanRwl@A...
2002-04-01 20:41:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] cap question
JanRwl@A...
2002-04-01 21:35:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cap question
Bill Vance
2002-04-01 22:51:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cap question
Jon Elson
2002-04-01 22:56:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] cap question
JanRwl@A...
2002-04-01 23:01:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cap question
Jon Elson
2002-04-01 23:01:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] cap question
Jon Elson
2002-04-01 23:17:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cap question
cadcamcenter
2002-04-02 00:12:07 UTC
Re: cap question
cadcamcenter
2002-04-02 00:19:02 UTC
Re: cap question
Mike Snodgrass
2002-04-02 07:00:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] cap question
Jon Elson
2002-04-02 10:53:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cap question
Jon Elson
2002-04-02 11:05:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] cap question
Sven Peter
2002-04-02 16:31:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cap question
ballendo
2002-04-13 03:55:20 UTC
Re: cap question