Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Matching Microsteps to moters
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2002-04-02 10:43:17 UTC
aspaguy wrote:
software you will use, the microstepping feature may or may improve the
smoothness. If your software produces ragged step pulses, then the
microstepping Gecko will be very helpful.
Jon
> These driversI'm sure the motors will be fine with the Gecko drivers. Depending on the
> are 12800 microstep drives. The Geckos are as I understand it are
> 2000 microstep drives (200 steps x 10 micro per step if I'm thinking
> correctly). This didn't concern me untill now as I have heard so much
> about how smooth the geckos make your machine perform. Now I see that
> Tims API drives have a 12800 setting, and after reading the previous
> posts I wonder if these might run smoother with my moters that were
> designed to run with 12800 microsteps. Will my moters run poorly with
> Geckos?
software you will use, the microstepping feature may or may improve the
smoothness. If your software produces ragged step pulses, then the
microstepping Gecko will be very helpful.
Jon
Discussion Thread
aspaguy
2002-04-01 22:24:24 UTC
Matching Microsteps to moters
William Scalione
2002-04-02 05:36:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Matching Microsteps to moters
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2002-04-02 06:49:33 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Matching Microsteps to moters
Jon Elson
2002-04-02 10:43:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Matching Microsteps to moters
aspaguy
2002-04-02 20:42:45 UTC
Re: Matching Microsteps to moters
aspaguy
2002-04-02 20:48:35 UTC
Re: Matching Microsteps to moters
aspaguy
2002-04-03 19:47:26 UTC
Re: Matching Microsteps to moters Mariss? TimG? Ballendo?
aspaguy
2002-04-03 19:48:24 UTC
Re: Matching Microsteps to moters